Analysis of Tobacco Drying with Different Energy Sources.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Analysis of Tobacco Drying with Different Energy Sources.
Authors: KIŠ, Darko1 dkis@fazos.hr, BUDIMIR, Ankica2 Ana_Budimir@bat.com, SVITLICA, Brankica2 bsvitlica@fazos.hr, KALAMBURA, Sanja3 sanja.kalambura@vvg.hr, KUJUNDŽIĆ, Sunčica1 suncicag@fazos.hr
Source: Technical Gazette / Tehnički Vjesnik. 2024, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p701-705. 5p.
Subjects: Tobacco analysis, Wood pellets, Wood chips, Biomass energy, Solar collectors, Combustion chambers, Solar energy
Abstract: Excessive use of fossil fuels has an extremely negative impact on the environment and climate, as it results in the emission of harmful gases into the atmosphere. The goal of this research was to compare the use of solar energy and biomass as an energy source for drying tobacco in relation to natural gas. The research covered the drying of Virginia tobacco leaves with batch dryers, namely: thermogen models that use wood chips ("Model 1"), firewood ("Model 2") and pellets ("Model 3"), one model with natural gas thermogen combined with solar cells ("Model 4") and one thermogen with classic tobacco drying with ground gas ("Model 5"). In the first and third drying phase "Model 1" provides enough energy for drying the tobacco leaf but in the second phase it could not provide the required temperature, so it is necessary to increase the capacity of the combustion chamber. "Model 2" fully meets the requirements of tobacco leaf drying technology. Using pellets according to "Model 3" there were no difficulties and the tobacco was dried with good quality. Energy saving by using solar collectors according to "Model 4" is about 20%. Natural gas drying showed as the most expensive one. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Technical Gazette / Tehnički Vjesnik is the property of Tehnicki Vjesnik and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Excessive use of fossil fuels has an extremely negative impact on the environment and climate, as it results in the emission of harmful gases into the atmosphere. The goal of this research was to compare the use of solar energy and biomass as an energy source for drying tobacco in relation to natural gas. The research covered the drying of Virginia tobacco leaves with batch dryers, namely: thermogen models that use wood chips ("Model 1"), firewood ("Model 2") and pellets ("Model 3"), one model with natural gas thermogen combined with solar cells ("Model 4") and one thermogen with classic tobacco drying with ground gas ("Model 5"). In the first and third drying phase "Model 1" provides enough energy for drying the tobacco leaf but in the second phase it could not provide the required temperature, so it is necessary to increase the capacity of the combustion chamber. "Model 2" fully meets the requirements of tobacco leaf drying technology. Using pellets according to "Model 3" there were no difficulties and the tobacco was dried with good quality. Energy saving by using solar collectors according to "Model 4" is about 20%. Natural gas drying showed as the most expensive one. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:13303651
DOI:10.17559/TV-20230428000586