View in EDS

Low‐Code and No‐Code Tools: A Valuable Aid or a Potential Threat to Professional Developers?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Low‐Code and No‐Code Tools: A Valuable Aid or a Potential Threat to Professional Developers?
Authors: Rafi, Saima1 (AUTHOR) s.rafi@napier.ac.uk, Akbar, Muhammad Azeem2 (AUTHOR), Mahmood, Sajjad3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Software: Practice & Experience. Jun2026, Vol. 56 Issue 6, p802-819. 18p.
Subjects: Computer software developers, Software development tools, Software engineering, Computer software development, Visual programming languages (Computer science)
Abstract: Background: The rapid adoption of low‐code (LC) and no‐code (NC) tools has transformed the software development landscape, offering faster development cycles and enabling non‐programmers to contribute to software creation. Objective: This study systematically maps the effects of LC/NC tools on developers, addressing the critical need to understand whether these tools serve as a valuable aid or a potential threat to their roles. Methods: By analyzing how LC/NC tools support development processes, the challenges they present, and their potential to replace traditional developers, this research fills a key knowledge gap by performing a systematic mapping study. Results: The findings reveal that while LC/NC tools simplify certain tasks, they do not replace the need for professional developers to handle complex technical challenges, change management, and system integration. Conclusions: Rather than posing a threat, these tools complement and enhance developers' expertise, empowering them to focus on more advanced aspects of software creation. This study provides valuable insights for the professional developer community and the broader software industry, advocating for the thoughtful integration of LC/NC tools as powerful aids rather than competitors to professional development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Software: Practice & Experience is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Background: The rapid adoption of low‐code (LC) and no‐code (NC) tools has transformed the software development landscape, offering faster development cycles and enabling non‐programmers to contribute to software creation. Objective: This study systematically maps the effects of LC/NC tools on developers, addressing the critical need to understand whether these tools serve as a valuable aid or a potential threat to their roles. Methods: By analyzing how LC/NC tools support development processes, the challenges they present, and their potential to replace traditional developers, this research fills a key knowledge gap by performing a systematic mapping study. Results: The findings reveal that while LC/NC tools simplify certain tasks, they do not replace the need for professional developers to handle complex technical challenges, change management, and system integration. Conclusions: Rather than posing a threat, these tools complement and enhance developers' expertise, empowering them to focus on more advanced aspects of software creation. This study provides valuable insights for the professional developer community and the broader software industry, advocating for the thoughtful integration of LC/NC tools as powerful aids rather than competitors to professional development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00380644
DOI:10.1002/spe.70067