Integrating Equity and Sustainability: Lessons Learned From the Adoption of Safer Degreasers by Small Businesses.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Integrating Equity and Sustainability: Lessons Learned From the Adoption of Safer Degreasers by Small Businesses.
Authors:	Chin, Roger J.¹ rchin@kingcounty.gov, Fellows, Katie M.¹, Meyer, Justin², Peckham, Trevor², Perkins, Myles¹
Source:	Journal of Environmental Health. Jun2026, Vol. 88 Issue 10, p8-14. 7p.
Subjects:	Pollution prevention, Cleaning compounds, Health literacy, Human services programs, Endowments, Cost effectiveness, Pets, Evaluation of human services programs, Pilot projects, Questionnaires, Sustainability, Business, Motivation (Psychology), Occupational exposure, Environmental justice, Economic impact, Hazardous substances, Health promotion, Quality assurance, Case studies, Industrial safety, Automobiles, Machinery
Geographic Terms:	Washington (State)
Abstract:	The Hazardous Waste Management Program in King County, Washington, initiated the Safer Alternative Degreaser Pilot Project to transition local businesses from hazardous degreaser products to safer alternatives, with the aim of reducing toxic exposures and promoting environ-mental justice. To help overcome economic and other barriers to switching, the initiative provided businesses with technical support, free trial products, and financial incentives via reimbursements to purchase safer degreasers and related equipment. A survey was administered to understand motivations and barriers to switching degreaser products, gather perspectives on safer products, and ensure equitable service provision. Despite implementation challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 50 businesses participated, 34 received trial products, and 32 received financial reimbursements. Moreover, 6 businesses adopted safer products, while 5 expressed interest in being recognized as an environmentally responsible business. The top barriers to switching to safer degreaser products included lack of knowledge, concerns about effectiveness, increased cleaning time, and initial costs. Our case study can inform and serve as a resource for other jurisdictions and communities that are interested in implementing similar programs. Additionally, our findings can provide insights and lessons learned to guide such efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Journal of Environmental Health is the property of National Environmental Health Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Engineering Source

Description
Abstract:	The Hazardous Waste Management Program in King County, Washington, initiated the Safer Alternative Degreaser Pilot Project to transition local businesses from hazardous degreaser products to safer alternatives, with the aim of reducing toxic exposures and promoting environ-mental justice. To help overcome economic and other barriers to switching, the initiative provided businesses with technical support, free trial products, and financial incentives via reimbursements to purchase safer degreasers and related equipment. A survey was administered to understand motivations and barriers to switching degreaser products, gather perspectives on safer products, and ensure equitable service provision. Despite implementation challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 50 businesses participated, 34 received trial products, and 32 received financial reimbursements. Moreover, 6 businesses adopted safer products, while 5 expressed interest in being recognized as an environmentally responsible business. The top barriers to switching to safer degreaser products included lack of knowledge, concerns about effectiveness, increased cleaning time, and initial costs. Our case study can inform and serve as a resource for other jurisdictions and communities that are interested in implementing similar programs. Additionally, our findings can provide insights and lessons learned to guide such efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	00220892