STM–AFM image formation on TiO2(1 1 0) 1×1 and 1×2 surfaces

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: STM–AFM image formation on TiO2(1 1 0) 1×1 and 1×2 surfaces
Authors: Ke, S.H.1 shke@jrcat.or.jp, Uda, T.1, Terakura, K.2
Source: Applied Surface Science. Mar2002, Vol. 188 Issue 3/4, p319. 6p.
Subjects: Titanium dioxide, Atomic force microscopy
Abstract: Ultra-soft pseudopotentials plane-wave technique is used to simulate the tip–sample interaction and STM–AFM image formation on TiO2(1 1 0) 1×1 and 1×2 surfaces. It is shown that the strong tip–oxygen chemical interaction determines the main feature of the AFM image formation. By checking the effects of tip-induced surface relaxation, spin polarization, and bias voltage, we show that it should be the significant tip-induced surface relaxation on the 1×1 surface which leads to the too small image corrugation observed experimentally on the 1×1 surface. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
Copyright of Applied Surface Science is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Ultra-soft pseudopotentials plane-wave technique is used to simulate the tip–sample interaction and STM–AFM image formation on TiO2(1 1 0) <F>1×1</F> and <F>1×2</F> surfaces. It is shown that the strong tip–oxygen chemical interaction determines the main feature of the AFM image formation. By checking the effects of tip-induced surface relaxation, spin polarization, and bias voltage, we show that it should be the significant tip-induced surface relaxation on the <F>1×1</F> surface which leads to the too small image corrugation observed experimentally on the <F>1×1</F> surface. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
ISSN:01694332
DOI:10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00944-8