Genetic analysis of bolting after winter in sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.).

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Genetic analysis of bolting after winter in sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.).
Authors:	Pfeiffer, Nina¹, Tränkner, Conny¹, Lemnian, Ioana², Grosse, Ivo², Müller, Andreas, Jung, Christian¹, Kopisch-Obuch, Friedrich¹ friedrich.kopisch-obuch@kws.com
Source:	Theoretical & Applied Genetics. Nov2014, Vol. 127 Issue 11, p2479-2489. 11p.
Subjects:	Bolting (Botany), Winter, Plant genetics, Sugar beets, Harvesting, Plant gene mapping
Abstract:	Key message: This study reveals for the first time a major QTL for post-winter bolting resistance in sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.). The knowledge of this QTL is a major contribution towards the development of a winter sugar beet with controlled bolting behavior. Abstract: In cool temperate climates, sugar beets are currently grown as a spring crop. They are sown in spring and harvested in autumn. Growing sugar beet as a winter crop with an extended vegetation period fails due to bolting after winter. Bolting after winter might be controlled by accumulating genes for post-winter bolting resistance. Previously, we had observed in field experiments a low post-winter bolting rate of 0.5 for sugar beet accession BETA 1773. This accession was crossed with a biennial sugar beet with regular bolting behavior to develop a F mapping population. The population was grown in the greenhouse, exposed to artificial cold treatment for 16 weeks and transplanted to the field. Bolting was recorded twice a week from May until October. Post-winter bolting behavior was assessed by two different factors, bolting delay (determined as days to bolt after cold treatment) and post-winter bolting resistance (bolting rate after winter). For days to bolt, means of F families ranged from 25 to 164 days while for bolting rate F families ranged from 0 to 1. For each factor one QTL explaining about 65 % of the phenotypic variation was mapped to the same region on linkage group 9 with a partially recessive allele increasing bolting delay and post-winter bolting resistance. The results are discussed in relation to the potential use of marker-assisted breeding of winter sugar beets with controlled bolting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Theoretical & Applied Genetics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Engineering Source

Description
Abstract:	Key message: This study reveals for the first time a major QTL for post-winter bolting resistance in sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.). The knowledge of this QTL is a major contribution towards the development of a winter sugar beet with controlled bolting behavior. Abstract: In cool temperate climates, sugar beets are currently grown as a spring crop. They are sown in spring and harvested in autumn. Growing sugar beet as a winter crop with an extended vegetation period fails due to bolting after winter. Bolting after winter might be controlled by accumulating genes for post-winter bolting resistance. Previously, we had observed in field experiments a low post-winter bolting rate of 0.5 for sugar beet accession BETA 1773. This accession was crossed with a biennial sugar beet with regular bolting behavior to develop a F mapping population. The population was grown in the greenhouse, exposed to artificial cold treatment for 16 weeks and transplanted to the field. Bolting was recorded twice a week from May until October. Post-winter bolting behavior was assessed by two different factors, bolting delay (determined as days to bolt after cold treatment) and post-winter bolting resistance (bolting rate after winter). For days to bolt, means of F families ranged from 25 to 164 days while for bolting rate F families ranged from 0 to 1. For each factor one QTL explaining about 65 % of the phenotypic variation was mapped to the same region on linkage group 9 with a partially recessive allele increasing bolting delay and post-winter bolting resistance. The results are discussed in relation to the potential use of marker-assisted breeding of winter sugar beets with controlled bolting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	00405752
DOI:	10.1007/s00122-014-2392-x