Impossible Jobs or Impossible Tasks? Client Volatility and Frontline Policing Practice in Urban Riots.
Saved in:
| Title: | Impossible Jobs or Impossible Tasks? Client Volatility and Frontline Policing Practice in Urban Riots. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Morrell, Kevin1 kevin.morrell@wbs.ac.uk, Currie, Graeme1 graeme.currie@wbs.ac.uk |
| Source: | Public Administration Review. Mar2015, Vol. 75 Issue 2, p264-275. 12p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Bureaucracy, *Occupations, Public administration, Public administration research, Social aspects, Legitimacy of governments, Riot control, Police, Psychology |
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
| Abstract: | Various public administration jobs are described as 'impossible,' meaning that they have an unpopular or illegitimate client base, stakeholders have conflicting values, and leaders and their agency's mission are continually questioned. Although this framework is widely used, it has also become overgeneralized. The authors propose three theoretical extensions to understanding impossible jobs based on findings from a three-year multimethod study of riot policing. First, a distinction can be drawn between impossible jobs and impossible tasks. Second, the relationship between impossible jobs and street-level bureaucracy is clarified; the case of riot police shows that some street-level bureaucrats face impossible tasks. Third, the authors show that the conceptualization of the client base has been overly static-in some situations, the client base fractures, or grows rapidly, and legitimacy can change in real time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Public Administration Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Various public administration jobs are described as 'impossible,' meaning that they have an unpopular or illegitimate client base, stakeholders have conflicting values, and leaders and their agency's mission are continually questioned. Although this framework is widely used, it has also become overgeneralized. The authors propose three theoretical extensions to understanding impossible jobs based on findings from a three-year multimethod study of riot policing. First, a distinction can be drawn between impossible jobs and impossible tasks. Second, the relationship between impossible jobs and street-level bureaucracy is clarified; the case of riot police shows that some street-level bureaucrats face impossible tasks. Third, the authors show that the conceptualization of the client base has been overly static-in some situations, the client base fractures, or grows rapidly, and legitimacy can change in real time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00333352 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/puar.12311 |
