Open Letter to the DSM-5.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Open Letter to the DSM-5.
Authors: Kamens, Sarah R.1 srkamens@gmail.com, Elkins, David N.2, Robbins, Brent Dean3
Source: Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Nov2017, Vol. 57 Issue 6, p675-687. 13p.
Subject Terms: Petitions, Psychologists, Psychiatry
Geographic Terms: United States
Company/Entity: American Psychological Association
Reviews & Products: Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Book)
Abstract: In October 2011, the Open Letter to the DSM-5 was posted as an online petition at http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/dsm5/. To the surprise of its authors, the petition garnered the endorsements of over 15,000 individuals and over 50 professional organizations, including 15 additional divisions of the American Psychological Association. It is here reproduced in print for the first time. For more details on the history of the Open Letter, see Robbins, Kamens, and Elkins (2017) in this special issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Humanistic Psychology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:In October 2011, the Open Letter to the DSM-5 was posted as an online petition at <ext-link>http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/dsm5/</ext-link>. To the surprise of its authors, the petition garnered the endorsements of over 15,000 individuals and over 50 professional organizations, including 15 additional divisions of the American Psychological Association. It is here reproduced in print for the first time. For more details on the history of the Open Letter, see Robbins, Kamens, and Elkins (2017) in this special issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00221678
DOI:10.1177/0022167817698261