The Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey and the Limitations of Vulnerability-based Politics.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey and the Limitations of Vulnerability-based Politics.
Authors: Copland, Simon1 Simon.Copland@anu.edu.au
Source: Australian Feminist Studies. Jun2018, Vol. 33 Issue 96, p261-274. 14p.
Subject Terms: Marriage law, Same-sex marriage, LGBTQ+ people, Homophobia, Gay couples
Company/Entity: Australia. Parliament
People: Turnbull, Malcolm, 1954-
Abstract: This article investigates opposition to the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey, which surveyed Australians on their position on marriage equality from September to November 2017. Opposition to the hosting of a public vote on marriage equality was based in a perceived vulnerability of LGBTIQ Australians, with marriage equality advocates taking what Tietze (2016) described as a ‘dark view of the voting public’. While acknowledging the high levels of homophobic rhetoric that occurred during the postal survey, and the impacts that public votes can have on the mental health of LGBTIQ people, the article argues this ‘dark view’ was overstated. This article argues that opposition to the survey reinforced vulnerability within LGBTIQ Australians, promoting an increased reliance on the state for protection and recognition. Opposition ignored the democratic potential of the survey, particularly as an opportunity to further debate on LGBTIQ issues and to reduce broader societal homophobia. Despite the eventual yes vote therefore, approaches to the postal survey missed a political opportunity, likely leaving LGBTIQ Australians and the Australian queer movement in a weaker position than previously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Australian Feminist Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 132000198
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey and the Limitations of Vulnerability-based Politics.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Copland%2C+Simon%22">Copland, Simon</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> Simon.Copland@anu.edu.au</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Australian+Feminist+Studies%22">Australian Feminist Studies</searchLink>. Jun2018, Vol. 33 Issue 96, p261-274. 14p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Marriage+law%22">Marriage law</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Same-sex+marriage%22">Same-sex marriage</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22LGBTQ%2B+people%22">LGBTQ+ people</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Homophobia%22">Homophobia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gay+couples%22">Gay couples</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectCompany
  Label: Company/Entity
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%2E+Parliament%22">Australia. Parliament</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectPerson
  Label: People
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="PE" term="%22Turnbull%2C+Malcolm%2C+1954-%22">Turnbull, Malcolm, 1954-</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This article investigates opposition to the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey, which surveyed Australians on their position on marriage equality from September to November 2017. Opposition to the hosting of a public vote on marriage equality was based in a perceived vulnerability of LGBTIQ Australians, with marriage equality advocates taking what Tietze (2016) described as a ‘dark view of the voting public’. While acknowledging the high levels of homophobic rhetoric that occurred during the postal survey, and the impacts that public votes can have on the mental health of LGBTIQ people, the article argues this ‘dark view’ was overstated. This article argues that opposition to the survey reinforced vulnerability within LGBTIQ Australians, promoting an increased reliance on the state for protection and recognition. Opposition ignored the democratic potential of the survey, particularly as an opportunity to further debate on LGBTIQ issues and to reduce broader societal homophobia. Despite the eventual yes vote therefore, approaches to the postal survey missed a political opportunity, likely leaving LGBTIQ Australians and the Australian queer movement in a weaker position than previously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Australian Feminist Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=132000198
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/08164649.2018.1517247
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 261
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Marriage law
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Same-sex marriage
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: LGBTQ+ people
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Homophobia
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Gay couples
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Australia. Parliament
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Turnbull, Malcolm, 1954-
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey and the Limitations of Vulnerability-based Politics.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Copland, Simon
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2018
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 08164649
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 33
            – Type: issue
              Value: 96
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Australian Feminist Studies
              Type: main
ResultId 1