View in EDS

Children's reading comprehension and metacomprehension on screen versus on paper.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Children's reading comprehension and metacomprehension on screen versus on paper.
Authors: Halamish, Vered1 (AUTHOR) vered.halamish@biu.ac.il, Elbaz, Elisya1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Computers & Education. Feb2020, Vol. 145, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subject Terms: *Reading comprehension, *Comprehension testing, *Mass media, Comprehension in children, Information display systems
Abstract: On-screen reading is becoming increasingly prevalent in educational settings, and children are now are expected to comprehend texts that they read on screens. However, research suggests that reading on screen impairs comprehension compared to reading on paper. Furthermore, this medium effect is not reflected in adults' metacomprehension judgments, which often reflect greater overconfidence when reading on screen. Adults are therefore usually metacognitively unaware of the detrimental effect that on-screen reading has on their comprehension. Whether and how the medium affects children's metacomprehension has not been examined before. The main purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of the medium used for reading (screen vs. paper) on children's reading comprehension and metacomprehension. Fifth grade children (N = 38) read short texts, estimated their comprehension of each text, and answered a reading comprehension test. They completed this task on paper for two texts and on screen for two other texts. Results suggested that the children's reading comprehension was better when reading on paper than on screen, although initial reading time was equivalent. This paper advantage was independent of medium preferences, computer usage habits, or reading skills. Children's metacomprehension judgments were insensitive to the effect of medium, and their medium preferences further suggested that they were indifferent to the medium used for reading, both before and after experiencing the task on both media. These results suggest that children, like adults, are metacognitively unaware of the detrimental effect that on-screen reading has on their comprehension, and they are likely to make ineffective medium choices for their reading tasks. • Reading on screen impaired children's comprehension compared to reading on paper. • Their metacomprehension judgments suggested that they were unaware of this effect. • Children had no clear a-priori preference for reading on paper versus on screen. • They were insensitive to the effect of medium even after experiencing it. • The effect of medium was unrelated to preferences, computer usage or reading skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Computers & Education is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:On-screen reading is becoming increasingly prevalent in educational settings, and children are now are expected to comprehend texts that they read on screens. However, research suggests that reading on screen impairs comprehension compared to reading on paper. Furthermore, this medium effect is not reflected in adults' metacomprehension judgments, which often reflect greater overconfidence when reading on screen. Adults are therefore usually metacognitively unaware of the detrimental effect that on-screen reading has on their comprehension. Whether and how the medium affects children's metacomprehension has not been examined before. The main purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of the medium used for reading (screen vs. paper) on children's reading comprehension and metacomprehension. Fifth grade children (N = 38) read short texts, estimated their comprehension of each text, and answered a reading comprehension test. They completed this task on paper for two texts and on screen for two other texts. Results suggested that the children's reading comprehension was better when reading on paper than on screen, although initial reading time was equivalent. This paper advantage was independent of medium preferences, computer usage habits, or reading skills. Children's metacomprehension judgments were insensitive to the effect of medium, and their medium preferences further suggested that they were indifferent to the medium used for reading, both before and after experiencing the task on both media. These results suggest that children, like adults, are metacognitively unaware of the detrimental effect that on-screen reading has on their comprehension, and they are likely to make ineffective medium choices for their reading tasks. • Reading on screen impaired children's comprehension compared to reading on paper. • Their metacomprehension judgments suggested that they were unaware of this effect. • Children had no clear a-priori preference for reading on paper versus on screen. • They were insensitive to the effect of medium even after experiencing it. • The effect of medium was unrelated to preferences, computer usage or reading skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:03601315
DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103737