Advocating for group interaction in the age of COVID-19.
Saved in:
| Title: | Advocating for group interaction in the age of COVID-19. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Järvelä, Sanna1 (AUTHOR), Rosé, Carolyn P.2 (AUTHOR) cp3a@andrew.cmu.edu |
| Source: | International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Jun2020, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p143-147. 5p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Age groups, COVID-19, Social interaction |
| Abstract: | The four papers of this issue contribute to two topical themes: namely, studies of regulation strategies and new methods for scaling up design and evaluation, both of which are critical themes at this time in the history of our field. Their study is quite timely, as during the current COVID-19 situation, self-organized, technology-supported study groups might be even more frequent than in the past, and a better understanding of this phenomenon contributes insights to needs that must be addressed in future CSCL research. The Melzner et al. study contributes insights to the CSCL field that uncover what differentiates successful from less successful self-organized collaborative learning groups. [Extracted from the article] |
| Copyright of International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The four papers of this issue contribute to two topical themes: namely, studies of regulation strategies and new methods for scaling up design and evaluation, both of which are critical themes at this time in the history of our field. Their study is quite timely, as during the current COVID-19 situation, self-organized, technology-supported study groups might be even more frequent than in the past, and a better understanding of this phenomenon contributes insights to needs that must be addressed in future CSCL research. The Melzner et al. study contributes insights to the CSCL field that uncover what differentiates successful from less successful self-organized collaborative learning groups. [Extracted from the article] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 15561607 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11412-020-09324-4 |
