Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
The Joys and Stresses of Social Relationships and the Effect on Resiliency During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Survey of U.S. Older Adults. |
| Authors: |
Westrick, Ashly C1 acwestr@umich.edu, Kobayashi, Lindsay C1, Kirch, Matthias2, Singer, Dianne3, Malani, Preeti N2, Kullgren, Jeffrey T2,4, Solway, Erica2, Finlay, Jessica M5 |
| Source: |
Gerontologist. Jul2024, Vol. 64 Issue 7, p1-9. 9p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Psychological resilience, *Emotions, *Family relations, *Interpersonal relations, *COVID-19 pandemic, Research funding, Multiple regression analysis, Sex distribution, Spouses, Descriptive statistics, Odds ratio, Psychological stress, Confidence intervals |
| Geographic Terms: |
United States |
| Abstract: |
Background and Objectives The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic placed unprecedented stress on older adults. Resiliency could mitigate deleterious effects of pandemic stressors. We described trends in resilience among U.S. adults aged 50–80 years approximately one and a half years after the onset of the pandemic, compared with before the pandemic, and evaluated associations between relationships and resilience. Research Design and Methods Data were from the National Poll on Healthy Aging (N = 2,100) in August 2021. Respondents rated their resiliency as compared with before the pandemic (more, about the same, or less) and different types of relationships (spouse/partner, friends, and neighbors) as sources of joy and/or stress during the pandemic (a lot, some, very little, and not at all). Multinomial logistic regressions (complete-case analysis) estimated the relationships between each joyful and stressful relationships and resiliency. Results Most participants reported feeling as resilient as before the pandemic (70.6%) with 14.5% feeling less resilient. More women than men felt less resilient than before the pandemic (16.7% vs 12.8%, p =.006). Feeling a lot of stress from one's spouse or neighbors was associated with increased likelihood of feeling less resilient than before the pandemic (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8, 7.7 and OR = 4.5; 95% CI: 1.5, 13.9, respectively), which was stronger among women (OR = 15.1; 95% CI: 4.8, 45.6) than men (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.4, 2.7). Discussion and Implications Social relationships may have been more important for women than for men in supporting resiliency during the pandemic. Understanding patterns of resiliency can help to inform policymaking and support the well-being of older adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Gerontologist is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |