Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Preliminary Exploration of Variations in Measures of Pharyngeal Area During Nonswallowing Tasks. |
| Authors: |
Steele, Catriona M.1,2,3 tri-swallowinglab@uhn.ca, Mancopes, Renata1, Barrett, Emily1, Panes, Vanessa1, Peladeau-Pigeon, Melanie1, Simmons, Michelle M.1, Smaoui, Sana1,2,4 |
| Source: |
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. Nov2024, Vol. 67 Issue 11, p4304-4313. 10p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Predictive tests, Pharynx physiology, Vowels, Task performance, Research funding, Computed tomography, Sex distribution, Descriptive statistics, Pharynx, Analysis of variance, Deglutition, Confidence intervals, Chin, Fluoroscopy, Reliability (Personality trait), Patient positioning |
| Abstract: |
Purpose: Age- and disease-related changes in oropharyngeal anatomy and physiology may be identified through quantitative videofluoroscopic measures of pharyngeal area and dynamics. Pixel-based measures of nonconstricted pharyngeal area (PhAR) are typically taken during oral bolus hold tasks or on post-swallow rest frames. A recent study in 87 healthy adults reported mean post-swallow PhAR of 62%(C2-4)², (range: 25%-135%), and significantly larger PhAR in males. The fact that measures were taken after initial bolus swallows without controlling for the presence of subsequent clearing swallows was identified as a potential source of variation. A subset of study participants had completed a protocol including additional static nonswallowing tasks, enabling us to explore variability across those tasks, taking sex differences into account. Method: Videofluoroscopy still shots were analyzed for 20 healthy adults (10 males, 10 females, Mage = 26 years) in head-neutral position, chin-down and chin-up positions, a sustained /a/ vowel vocalization, and oral bolus hold tasks (1-cc, 5-cc). Trained raters used ImageJ software to measure PhAR in %(C2-4)² units. Measures were compared to previously reported mean postswallow PhAR for the same participants: (a) explorations of sex differences; (b) pairwise linear mixed-model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) of PhAR for each nonswallowing task versus postswallow measures, controlling for sex; and (c) a combined mixed-model ANOVA to confirm comparability of the subset of tasks showing no significant differences from postswallow measures in Step 2. Results: Overall, PhAR measures were significantly larger in male participants; however, most pairwise task comparisons did not differ by sex. No significant differences from postswallow measures were seen for 5-cc bolus hold, chin-down and chin-up postures, and the second (but not the first) of two repeated head neutral still shots. PhAR during a 5-cc bolus hold was most similar to postswallow measures: mean ± standard deviation of 51 ± 13%(C2-4)² in females and 64 ± 16%(C2-4)² in males. Conclusions: PhAR is larger in men than in women. Oral bolus hold tasks with a 5-cc liquid bolus yield similar measures to those obtained from postswallow rest frames. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |