View in EDS PDF Full Text

Treatment and Outcome Metrics for Speech-Language Pathology Treatment of Upper Airway Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Treatment and Outcome Metrics for Speech-Language Pathology Treatment of Upper Airway Disorders: A Systematic Review.
Authors: Sandage, Mary J.1 sandamj@auburn.edu, Morton-Jones, Mariah E.2, Hall-Landers, Rebecca J.1, Tucker, Jordan G.1
Source: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. Nov2024, Vol. 67 Issue 11, p4391-4410. 20p.
Subject Terms: *Exercise, *Voice disorders, *Citation analysis, *Speech therapy, Treatment of respiratory obstructions, Laryngeal diseases, Therapeutics, Evaluation of medical care, Descriptive statistics, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Quality assurance, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems
Abstract: Objective: Clinical treatment strategies and progress metrics for patients with inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) have not been systematically applied across clinics. The goals of this review were to identify the intervention strategies used to treat upper airway disorders and determine the clinical metrics by which improvement or resolution of ILO/EILO is determined in clinical studies of speech-language pathology intervention. Method: A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Systematic Reviews Checklist. English language, full-text publications were identified through MEDLINE (Ovid), APA PsycINFO, and Web of Science for publications that described clinical outcomes following behavioral treatment for iLo provided by a speech-language pathologist (SLP). Results: A total of 238 sources were retrieved, of which 75 were duplicates. Titles and abstracts of 163 were screened, with 22 sources included for full-text review. Citation review yielded nine additional resources. Thirty-one sources were included for data extraction. Most sources described use of respiratory/laryngeal retraining. There was a lack of consistency for clinical and standardized metrics used to evaluate improvement or resolution of upper airway symptoms. Conclusions: Behavioral and standardized outcome metrics for evaluating therapy outcomes from SLP behavioral intervention of ILO/EILO are not consistently applied. Clinical metrics standards for clinicians are needed to provide a means to evaluate graded improvement in treatment and changes in health care utilization as well as for training less-experienced clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Objective: Clinical treatment strategies and progress metrics for patients with inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) have not been systematically applied across clinics. The goals of this review were to identify the intervention strategies used to treat upper airway disorders and determine the clinical metrics by which improvement or resolution of ILO/EILO is determined in clinical studies of speech-language pathology intervention. Method: A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Systematic Reviews Checklist. English language, full-text publications were identified through MEDLINE (Ovid), APA PsycINFO, and Web of Science for publications that described clinical outcomes following behavioral treatment for iLo provided by a speech-language pathologist (SLP). Results: A total of 238 sources were retrieved, of which 75 were duplicates. Titles and abstracts of 163 were screened, with 22 sources included for full-text review. Citation review yielded nine additional resources. Thirty-one sources were included for data extraction. Most sources described use of respiratory/laryngeal retraining. There was a lack of consistency for clinical and standardized metrics used to evaluate improvement or resolution of upper airway symptoms. Conclusions: Behavioral and standardized outcome metrics for evaluating therapy outcomes from SLP behavioral intervention of ILO/EILO are not consistently applied. Clinical metrics standards for clinicians are needed to provide a means to evaluate graded improvement in treatment and changes in health care utilization as well as for training less-experienced clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10924388
DOI:10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00396