HOW VALID ARE OPEN UNIVERSITY EXAM PASSING STANDARDS? CONSISTENCY OF CLASSIFICATION BY CUT-OFF POINTS.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	HOW VALID ARE OPEN UNIVERSITY EXAM PASSING STANDARDS? CONSISTENCY OF CLASSIFICATION BY CUT-OFF POINTS.
Authors:	BARAN, Hakan¹ hakanbrn@gmail.com, AKYILDIZ, Murat² muratakyildiz@anadolu.edu.tr
Source:	Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE). Apr2025, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p120-132. 13p.
Subject Terms:	Assessment of education, Summative tests, Higher education exams, Distance education, *Education students
Abstract:	Evaluation decisions regarding students' success in Open Education faculties such as pass/fail based on cut-off scores affect the quality of these systems. The qualification of Open Education students to obtain a bachelor's or associate's degree is determined by their passing grade. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the minimum passing scores used in Open Education examinations differ from the currently used minimum passing scores according to different standard-setting methods and the classification consistency of the cut-off scores obtained by these methods with the currently used cut-off scores and with each other. The participants consisted of 15 experts, consisting of textbook authors and lecturers of the Basic Disaster Knowledge Course this course. The results showed that in the final and midterm examinations, the percentage of successful students according to the cutoff points identified using the Angoff and Nedelsky methods was significantly lower than the percentage of successful students according to the current cut-off scores of the Open Education Examinations. The standards to be determined based on academic principles were different from the ones identified by administrative decisions. Further, the pass/fail decisions based on academic principles differed from those based on administrative decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE) is the property of Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	Evaluation decisions regarding students' success in Open Education faculties such as pass/fail based on cut-off scores affect the quality of these systems. The qualification of Open Education students to obtain a bachelor's or associate's degree is determined by their passing grade. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the minimum passing scores used in Open Education examinations differ from the currently used minimum passing scores according to different standard-setting methods and the classification consistency of the cut-off scores obtained by these methods with the currently used cut-off scores and with each other. The participants consisted of 15 experts, consisting of textbook authors and lecturers of the Basic Disaster Knowledge Course this course. The results showed that in the final and midterm examinations, the percentage of successful students according to the cutoff points identified using the Angoff and Nedelsky methods was significantly lower than the percentage of successful students according to the current cut-off scores of the Open Education Examinations. The standards to be determined based on academic principles were different from the ones identified by administrative decisions. Further, the pass/fail decisions based on academic principles differed from those based on administrative decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	13026488
DOI:	10.17718/tojde.1510157