Quality Standards of Transitional Programmes for International Medical Graduates: An International Modified Delphi Study to Develop a Theory‐Based Framework.
Saved in:
| Title: | Quality Standards of Transitional Programmes for International Medical Graduates: An International Modified Delphi Study to Develop a Theory‐Based Framework. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Murillo‐Zepeda, Carlos1,2 (AUTHOR) carlos.murillo@luhs.org, Pearson, Mark2 (AUTHOR), Ellawala, Amaya2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Clinical Teacher. Jun2025, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p1-8. 8p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Corporate culture, *Curriculum, *Instructional systems, *Educational programs, Quality standards, Foreign physicians, Health care industry, Consensus (Social sciences) |
| Abstract: | Background: Interventions aimed at supporting international medical graduates during the transition to host countries facilitate adjustment to these new workplace environments. Despite the progress made on clarifying the mechanisms operating behind successful interventions, there is still a theory‐practice gap that stems in part from lack of guidance on their design and implementation. Therefore, this study sought to develop and validate a set of standards to enhance the quality of the design and implementation of programmes aimed at supporting the transition of international medical graduates to the host countries' healthcare and educational systems. Methods: A modified e‐Delphi method was applied for this study. Initially, a literature review was carried out to identify potential participants. Subsequently, a preliminary questionnaire was developed by adapting the key assumptions of a programme theory. Then, the consensus panel was assembled including researchers and programme directors with expertise in training international medical graduates. Participants' ratings were polled iteratively over two rounds, and items with a consensus agreement above 50% in the relevance criterion were included in the final set of standards. Results: The response rate was 16% (20/119). Most panellists were from European countries and the majority held professor positions in urban, university‐based settings. This set of quality statements emphasise the importance of organisational culture and the responsibility of host‐institutions to support the transition of IMGs to the new workplace environment. Conclusions: This project provides a validated theory‐based framework to inform decisions on the design and implementation of programmes aimed at supporting the transition of international medical graduates to the host countries' healthcare and educational systems. Further research endeavours should evaluate the impact of this set of standards on adjustment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Clinical Teacher is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Background: Interventions aimed at supporting international medical graduates during the transition to host countries facilitate adjustment to these new workplace environments. Despite the progress made on clarifying the mechanisms operating behind successful interventions, there is still a theory‐practice gap that stems in part from lack of guidance on their design and implementation. Therefore, this study sought to develop and validate a set of standards to enhance the quality of the design and implementation of programmes aimed at supporting the transition of international medical graduates to the host countries' healthcare and educational systems. Methods: A modified e‐Delphi method was applied for this study. Initially, a literature review was carried out to identify potential participants. Subsequently, a preliminary questionnaire was developed by adapting the key assumptions of a programme theory. Then, the consensus panel was assembled including researchers and programme directors with expertise in training international medical graduates. Participants' ratings were polled iteratively over two rounds, and items with a consensus agreement above 50% in the relevance criterion were included in the final set of standards. Results: The response rate was 16% (20/119). Most panellists were from European countries and the majority held professor positions in urban, university‐based settings. This set of quality statements emphasise the importance of organisational culture and the responsibility of host‐institutions to support the transition of IMGs to the new workplace environment. Conclusions: This project provides a validated theory‐based framework to inform decisions on the design and implementation of programmes aimed at supporting the transition of international medical graduates to the host countries' healthcare and educational systems. Further research endeavours should evaluate the impact of this set of standards on adjustment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 17434971 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/tct.70092 |
