Known Item Search: Theoretical and Practical Considerations.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Known Item Search: Theoretical and Practical Considerations.
Authors: Hjørland, Birger1 birger.hjorland@hum.ku.dk
Source: Library Resources & Technical Services. Jul2025, Vol. 69 Issue 3, p1-17. 17p.
Subject Terms: *Libraries, *Librarians, *Library materials, *Metadata, Library catalogs
Abstract: This article looks at the concept "known item search" (KIS) and considers it in relation to library practices. The author critically examines previous research on KIS and argues that the concept is important because it is categorically different from "subject search" and because it is assumed in processes such as bibliographic verification and descriptive cataloging. The article further discusses which kinds of metadata best serve KIS and argues that the traditional distinction between descriptive cataloging and subject cataloging is a fruitful point of departure for describing the metadata needed for respectively KIS and subject searches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Library Resources & Technical Services is the property of American Library Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:This article looks at the concept "known item search" (KIS) and considers it in relation to library practices. The author critically examines previous research on KIS and argues that the concept is important because it is categorically different from "subject search" and because it is assumed in processes such as bibliographic verification and descriptive cataloging. The article further discusses which kinds of metadata best serve KIS and argues that the traditional distinction between descriptive cataloging and subject cataloging is a fruitful point of departure for describing the metadata needed for respectively KIS and subject searches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00242527
DOI:10.5860/lrts.69n3.8497