Development of Evaluation Criteria and Comparison of Performance Between Sophomore and Upper-Division Resident Assistants.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Development of Evaluation Criteria and Comparison of Performance Between Sophomore and Upper-Division Resident Assistants.
Authors:	HALL, KELLY S.¹ kelly.hall@tamuk.edu, SEVERANCE, DANA A.²
Source:	Journal of College & University Student Housing. 2025, Vol. 51 Issue 2, p28-47. 20p.
Subject Terms:	Universities & colleges, Community development, *Research personnel, Planned communities, Housing development
Abstract:	THE HIGH TURNOVER OF RESIDENT ASSISTANTS at institutions of higher education continues to be a problem. Upper-division students of at least a junior standing typically fill the resident assistant (RA) position, but housing professionals are increasingly considering hiring sophomore RAs. The purpose of this mixed-methods exploratory study design was to develop evaluation criteria and to compare the performance of first-time sophomore and upper-division RAs. Content analysis was used to develop evaluation criteria. Performance criteria included relationships with residents and staff, residential community development, programming, and administration. These criteria were then used to predict class standing ex post facto. Researchers gathered data from nine U.S. universities for 302 resident assistants in the Mid-Atlantic Region. Excluded were RAs of nontraditional age. We analyzed data using binary logistic regression. Results showed that performance criteria did not predict an RA's class standing. This finding will give housing professionals more confidence in selecting sophomore students to serve as resident assistants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Journal of College & University Student Housing is the property of Association of College & University Housing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	THE HIGH TURNOVER OF RESIDENT ASSISTANTS at institutions of higher education continues to be a problem. Upper-division students of at least a junior standing typically fill the resident assistant (RA) position, but housing professionals are increasingly considering hiring sophomore RAs. The purpose of this mixed-methods exploratory study design was to develop evaluation criteria and to compare the performance of first-time sophomore and upper-division RAs. Content analysis was used to develop evaluation criteria. Performance criteria included relationships with residents and staff, residential community development, programming, and administration. These criteria were then used to predict class standing ex post facto. Researchers gathered data from nine U.S. universities for 302 resident assistants in the Mid-Atlantic Region. Excluded were RAs of nontraditional age. We analyzed data using binary logistic regression. Results showed that performance criteria did not predict an RA's class standing. This finding will give housing professionals more confidence in selecting sophomore students to serve as resident assistants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	0161827X