Are Competence Beliefs or Value Beliefs More Important for STEM Career Aspirations?—Longitudinal Mediation Analyses Based on Recent Modeling Approaches Show Different Results.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Are Competence Beliefs or Value Beliefs More Important for STEM Career Aspirations?—Longitudinal Mediation Analyses Based on Recent Modeling Approaches Show Different Results.
Authors: Debatin, Tobias1 tobias.debatin@ur.de, Stoeger, Heidrun1, Ziegler, Albert2
Source: Journal of Youth & Adolescence. Jul2025, Vol. 54 Issue 7, p1768-1778. 11p.
Subject Terms: *High schools, *Psychology of high school students, *Motivation (Psychology), *Longitudinal method, *Factor analysis, *Vocational guidance, Scale analysis (Psychology), Mathematics, Cronbach's alpha, Science, Engineering, Probability theory, Chi-squared test, Descriptive statistics, Technology, Confidence intervals, Data analysis software, Professional competence, Self-perception
Geographic Terms: Germany
Abstract: There is a consensus in situated expectancy-value theory research that value beliefs better predict career aspirations and choices than competence beliefs and thus should be the main target of interventions aimed to motivate youth for STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) careers. However, research on the longer-term causal effects of the two constructs and their indirect effects is missing. The latter is relevant since competence beliefs seem to influence value beliefs but less the other way around. The present study investigated such longer-term effects and the underlying indirect effects in a sample of 690 students from Germany (52.6% girls; M (T1) = 15.26 years, SD = 0.68) over three measurement points from the middle of Grade 9 to the middle of Grade 10. For these purposes, two recent models with improved properties for identifying causal effects, the random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) and the dynamic panel model, as well as the traditional CLPM were applied. Final analyses were based on the RI-CLPM, and the results were compared to the traditional CLPM. Both models found the expected tendency of higher effects of STEM value beliefs on STEM career aspirations from one time point to the next. However, regarding the longer-term total effects, the analysis based on the RI-CLPM found a slight tendency for larger effects of competence beliefs, including an indirect effect of competence beliefs via value beliefs. These findings indicate that the competence beliefs of youth should not be underestimated in developing interventions for career aspirations and choices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Youth & Adolescence is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 186534040
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Are Competence Beliefs or Value Beliefs More Important for STEM Career Aspirations?—Longitudinal Mediation Analyses Based on Recent Modeling Approaches Show Different Results.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Debatin%2C+Tobias%22">Debatin, Tobias</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> tobias.debatin@ur.de</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stoeger%2C+Heidrun%22">Stoeger, Heidrun</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ziegler%2C+Albert%22">Ziegler, Albert</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Youth+%26+Adolescence%22">Journal of Youth & Adolescence</searchLink>. Jul2025, Vol. 54 Issue 7, p1768-1778. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+schools%22">High schools</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+of+high+school+students%22">Psychology of high school students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motivation+%28Psychology%29%22">Motivation (Psychology)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+method%22">Longitudinal method</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+analysis%22">Factor analysis</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocational+guidance%22">Vocational guidance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scale+analysis+%28Psychology%29%22">Scale analysis (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics%22">Mathematics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cronbach's+alpha%22">Cronbach's alpha</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science%22">Science</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering%22">Engineering</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probability+theory%22">Probability theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chi-squared+test%22">Chi-squared test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology%22">Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+competence%22">Professional competence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-perception%22">Self-perception</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Germany%22">Germany</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: There is a consensus in situated expectancy-value theory research that value beliefs better predict career aspirations and choices than competence beliefs and thus should be the main target of interventions aimed to motivate youth for STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) careers. However, research on the longer-term causal effects of the two constructs and their indirect effects is missing. The latter is relevant since competence beliefs seem to influence value beliefs but less the other way around. The present study investigated such longer-term effects and the underlying indirect effects in a sample of 690 students from Germany (52.6% girls; M (T1) = 15.26 years, SD = 0.68) over three measurement points from the middle of Grade 9 to the middle of Grade 10. For these purposes, two recent models with improved properties for identifying causal effects, the random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) and the dynamic panel model, as well as the traditional CLPM were applied. Final analyses were based on the RI-CLPM, and the results were compared to the traditional CLPM. Both models found the expected tendency of higher effects of STEM value beliefs on STEM career aspirations from one time point to the next. However, regarding the longer-term total effects, the analysis based on the RI-CLPM found a slight tendency for larger effects of competence beliefs, including an indirect effect of competence beliefs via value beliefs. These findings indicate that the competence beliefs of youth should not be underestimated in developing interventions for career aspirations and choices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Youth & Adolescence is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=186534040
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10964-025-02162-3
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 1768
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: High schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychology of high school students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Motivation (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Vocational guidance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scale analysis (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cronbach's alpha
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Engineering
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Probability theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Chi-squared test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Professional competence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Germany
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Are Competence Beliefs or Value Beliefs More Important for STEM Career Aspirations?—Longitudinal Mediation Analyses Based on Recent Modeling Approaches Show Different Results.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Debatin, Tobias
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stoeger, Heidrun
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ziegler, Albert
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00472891
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 54
            – Type: issue
              Value: 7
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Youth & Adolescence
              Type: main
ResultId 1