View in EDS

ESPOUSING HOPE OR ENTRENCHING GLOOM? A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF OXFAM'S GLOBAL INEQUALITY REPORTS THROUGH THE LENS OF FREIRE'S PEDAGOGY OF HOPE.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: ESPOUSING HOPE OR ENTRENCHING GLOOM? A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF OXFAM'S GLOBAL INEQUALITY REPORTS THROUGH THE LENS OF FREIRE'S PEDAGOGY OF HOPE.
Authors: ARKO, BENEDICT1
Source: Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review. Autumn2025, Issue 41, p30-50. 21p.
Subject Terms: *Critical pedagogy, Critical discourse analysis, Collective action, Climate change, Social injustice, Social change, Ecofeminism, Nonprofit organizations
Company/Entity: Oxfam International (Organization)
People: Freire, Paulo, 1921-1997
Abstract: As inequality, climate crisis, and threats to democracy grow, debates on poverty and justice have become urgent. This article applies critical discourse analysis (CDA) and Paulo Freire's 'pedagogy of hope' to examine how Oxfam's global inequality reports (2016-2025) have evolved. It asks whether these reports only dramatise crisis or also foster hope and action. A comparison of ten reports shows a shift: earlier texts stressed crisis and elite blame, while later ones highlight collective action and alternatives. Using CDA's three levels, text, discourse, and social practice, the study finds Oxfam increasingly challenges the view that neoliberalism is inevitable. Later reports emphasise feminist economics, grassroots organising, and fairer wealth distribution as real solutions. Guided by Freire's idea that hope arises through struggle, the study shows that while early reports risked hopelessness, later ones invite readers to see themselves as agents of change. The article argues that advocacy texts can be pedagogical tools, naming injustice while building the emotional and political conditions for democratic renewal and resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review is the property of Centre for Global Education and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:As inequality, climate crisis, and threats to democracy grow, debates on poverty and justice have become urgent. This article applies critical discourse analysis (CDA) and Paulo Freire's 'pedagogy of hope' to examine how Oxfam's global inequality reports (2016-2025) have evolved. It asks whether these reports only dramatise crisis or also foster hope and action. A comparison of ten reports shows a shift: earlier texts stressed crisis and elite blame, while later ones highlight collective action and alternatives. Using CDA's three levels, text, discourse, and social practice, the study finds Oxfam increasingly challenges the view that neoliberalism is inevitable. Later reports emphasise feminist economics, grassroots organising, and fairer wealth distribution as real solutions. Guided by Freire's idea that hope arises through struggle, the study shows that while early reports risked hopelessness, later ones invite readers to see themselves as agents of change. The article argues that advocacy texts can be pedagogical tools, naming injustice while building the emotional and political conditions for democratic renewal and resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:1748135X