The Editorial Word: AI.
Saved in:
| Title: | The Editorial Word: AI. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Stephenson, Kim G. (AUTHOR), Brown, Karen L. (AUTHOR), Lewis, Katie D. (AUTHOR), Novak, Angela M.1 (AUTHOR) angelamnovak13@gmail.com |
| Source: | Journal of Advanced Academics. Feb2026, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p139-146. 8p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Artificial intelligence, *Generative artificial intelligence, Honesty, University research, Publishing |
| Abstract: | The article focuses on the ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic research and publishing, distinguishing between assistive AI and generative AI (GenAI). Assistive AI tools enhance tasks without requiring disclosure, while GenAI tools, which can create content, must be disclosed by authors and reviewers. The article outlines new procedures for authors and reviewers at JoAA, emphasizing the need for transparency regarding AI use in manuscripts. It also highlights the importance of ethical considerations in AI applications, referencing UNESCO's core values to guide responsible practices in the evolving landscape of AI technology. [Extracted from the article] |
| Copyright of Journal of Advanced Academics is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The article focuses on the ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic research and publishing, distinguishing between assistive AI and generative AI (GenAI). Assistive AI tools enhance tasks without requiring disclosure, while GenAI tools, which can create content, must be disclosed by authors and reviewers. The article outlines new procedures for authors and reviewers at JoAA, emphasizing the need for transparency regarding AI use in manuscripts. It also highlights the importance of ethical considerations in AI applications, referencing UNESCO's core values to guide responsible practices in the evolving landscape of AI technology. [Extracted from the article] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1932202X |
| DOI: | 10.1177/1932202X251409113 |
