The right to speak: exploring academic freedom in turbulent times.
Saved in:
| Title: | The right to speak: exploring academic freedom in turbulent times. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Naepi, Sereana1 (AUTHOR) s.naepi@auckland.ac.nz, Jack, Kate1 (AUTHOR) kjac581@aucklanduni.ac.nz, Waymouth, Matthew1 (AUTHOR) mway010@aucklanduni.ac.nz, Naepi, Chelsea1 (AUTHOR) cnae054@auckland.ac.nz, Vandewiele, Callie1 (AUTHOR) callie.vandewiele@auckland.ac.nz |
| Source: | Higher Education (00181560). Apr2026, Vol. 91 Issue 4, p1399-1418. 20p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Academic freedom, *Higher education, *Academic discourse, Statutes, New Zealand history, Neoliberalism, Polarization (Social sciences) |
| Geographic Terms: | New Zealand |
| Abstract: | The concept of academic freedom remains contested globally, with increasing threats to academic expression appearing across different national contexts. New Zealand offers a unique case study as one of the few countries with comprehensive legal protection of academic freedom enshrined in education legislation. This paper examines how legislative protection of academic freedom has functioned in practice by comparing academic freedom controversies before and after its introduction into New Zealand law. Despite detailed legal provisions, we find that unclear definitions, inadequate guidelines, and the neoliberal restructuring of higher education have created persistent challenges in distinguishing between individual expertise and opinion and between institutional and individual responsibilities. These findings provide important insights for international debates about academic freedom, suggesting that legislation alone is insufficient protection without clear operational guidelines and protections from economic pressures that create conflicting institutional priorities. The paper contributes to a global understanding of how academic freedom can be better protected in increasingly polarised political environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Higher Education (00181560) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The concept of academic freedom remains contested globally, with increasing threats to academic expression appearing across different national contexts. New Zealand offers a unique case study as one of the few countries with comprehensive legal protection of academic freedom enshrined in education legislation. This paper examines how legislative protection of academic freedom has functioned in practice by comparing academic freedom controversies before and after its introduction into New Zealand law. Despite detailed legal provisions, we find that unclear definitions, inadequate guidelines, and the neoliberal restructuring of higher education have created persistent challenges in distinguishing between individual expertise and opinion and between institutional and individual responsibilities. These findings provide important insights for international debates about academic freedom, suggesting that legislation alone is insufficient protection without clear operational guidelines and protections from economic pressures that create conflicting institutional priorities. The paper contributes to a global understanding of how academic freedom can be better protected in increasingly polarised political environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00181560 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10734-025-01476-2 |
