View in EDS PDF Full Text

Predictors of Morphosyntactic Growth in Typically Developing Toddlers: Contributions of Parent Input and Child Sex.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Predictors of Morphosyntactic Growth in Typically Developing Toddlers: Contributions of Parent Input and Child Sex.
Authors: Hadley, Pamela A.1 phadley@illinois.edu, Rispoli, Matthew1, Fitzgerald, Colleen1, Bahnsen, Alison1
Source: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. Apr2011, Vol. 54 Issue 2, p549-566. 18p. 9 Charts, 3 Graphs.
Subject Terms: *Comparative grammar, *Language acquisition, *Longitudinal method, *Parents, *Vocabulary, *Theory, Analysis of variance, Mathematical models, Reliability (Personality trait), Research funding, Sex distribution, T-test (Statistics)
Geographic Terms: Illinois
Abstract: Purpose: Theories of morphosyntactic development must account for between-child differences in morphosyntactic growth rates. This study extends Legate and Yang's (2007) theoretically motivated crosslinguistic approach to determine if variation in properties of parent input accounts for differences in the growth of tense productivity. Method: Fifteen toddlers (and parents) participated. None were producing tense morphemes productively at 21 months. Two dependent measures of morphosyntactic growth between 21 and 30 months were used: empirical Bayes linear coefficients at 21 months and predicted productivity scores at 30 months. Predictor variables included child sex, vocabulary, and mean length of utterance as well as 4 measures of parent language input at 21 months. Results: Input informativeness for tense was the most consistent predictor of morphosyntactic growth, explaining 28.3% of the unique variance in children's linear growth coefficients at 21 months and 23.0% of the unique variance in predicted tense productivity scores at 30 months. General input measures were unrelated. Child sex explained an additional 24.7% of the variance in early linear growth. Child vocabulary at 21 months did not explain a significant proportion of unique variance. Conclusion: The findings provide evidence that input informativeness, an abstract and distributed property of input, contributes to morphosyntactic growth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Purpose: Theories of morphosyntactic development must account for between-child differences in morphosyntactic growth rates. This study extends Legate and Yang's (2007) theoretically motivated crosslinguistic approach to determine if variation in properties of parent input accounts for differences in the growth of tense productivity. Method: Fifteen toddlers (and parents) participated. None were producing tense morphemes productively at 21 months. Two dependent measures of morphosyntactic growth between 21 and 30 months were used: empirical Bayes linear coefficients at 21 months and predicted productivity scores at 30 months. Predictor variables included child sex, vocabulary, and mean length of utterance as well as 4 measures of parent language input at 21 months. Results: Input informativeness for tense was the most consistent predictor of morphosyntactic growth, explaining 28.3% of the unique variance in children's linear growth coefficients at 21 months and 23.0% of the unique variance in predicted tense productivity scores at 30 months. General input measures were unrelated. Child sex explained an additional 24.7% of the variance in early linear growth. Child vocabulary at 21 months did not explain a significant proportion of unique variance. Conclusion: The findings provide evidence that input informativeness, an abstract and distributed property of input, contributes to morphosyntactic growth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10924388
DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0216)