How is urban co-production conveyed in European cities?
Saved in:
| Authors: | Bragaglia, Francesca1 (AUTHOR), Janin Rivolin, Umberto1 (AUTHOR) umberto.janinrivolin@polito.it, Berisha, Erblin1 (AUTHOR), Cotella, Giancarlo1 (AUTHOR) |
|---|---|
| Source: | European Planning Studies. Jul2024, Vol. 32 Issue 7, p1613-1631. 19p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Property rights, *Urban planning, Cities & towns, Urbanization, Urban policy |
| Geographic Terms: | Europe |
| Abstract: | Urban co-production, through which citizens contribute with the public institutions to the planning or governance of the city, is a growing practice throughout Europe. However, apart from the more widespread and spontaneous 'co-city' model, only a few countries have adopted state policies of urban co-production. A comparative inquiry of the European spatial governance and planning systems (SGPSs) highlights at least three possible types of correlation between systems and urban co-production. Urban co-production as a state policy appears to take shape only in countries with SGPSs characterized by a greater capacity for public control over spatial development. Moreover, only SGPSs that allocate land rights on a case-by-case basis seem able to ensure that co-production operates within (and not outside) the system itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Database: | Entrepreneurial Studies Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Urban co-production, through which citizens contribute with the public institutions to the planning or governance of the city, is a growing practice throughout Europe. However, apart from the more widespread and spontaneous 'co-city' model, only a few countries have adopted state policies of urban co-production. A comparative inquiry of the European spatial governance and planning systems (SGPSs) highlights at least three possible types of correlation between systems and urban co-production. Urban co-production as a state policy appears to take shape only in countries with SGPSs characterized by a greater capacity for public control over spatial development. Moreover, only SGPSs that allocate land rights on a case-by-case basis seem able to ensure that co-production operates within (and not outside) the system itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 09654313 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/09654313.2024.2339933 |
