The Effects of Tactile Vs. Verbal Reinforcement on Attention to Task and Arithmetic Accuracy of Emotionally Disturbed Boys.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Effects of Tactile Vs. Verbal Reinforcement on Attention to Task and Arithmetic Accuracy of Emotionally Disturbed Boys.
Authors: Clements, J. E., Tracy, D. B.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 17
Publication Date: 1975
Document Type: Speeches/Meeting Papers
Descriptors: Attention Span, Behavior Change, Emotional Disturbances, Exceptional Child Research, Intermediate Grades, Mathematics, Positive Reinforcement, Problem Solving, Success
Abstract: A study involving 20 emotionally disturbed boys (9- to 11-years-old) was conducted to determine the effects of tactile and verbal reinforcement on attention to task and accuracy. Ss were given arithmetic problems to work during 16 20-minute sessions under four conditions: tactile reinforcement (intermittent touch pressure applied to Ss shoulders as they worked); verbal reinforcement (intermittent praise by the teacher); a combination of tactile and verbal reinforcement; and control treatment (no reinforcement cues). At the end of each period, scores were calculated for each S on both attention to task and accuracy of performance. Results showed that the combination treatment was most effective in producing high attention to task and high accuracy in problem solving; that tactile and verbal reinforcement alone ranked second and third in effectiveness; and that combination, verbal, and tactile treatments were all superior to the control with the exception that verbal reinforcement alone failed to produce higher problem solving accuracy. (Author/SB)
Notes: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Washington, D.C., March 30-April 3, 1975)
Journal Code: RIEFEB1976
Entry Date: 1976
Accession Number: ED112574
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:A study involving 20 emotionally disturbed boys (9- to 11-years-old) was conducted to determine the effects of tactile and verbal reinforcement on attention to task and accuracy. Ss were given arithmetic problems to work during 16 20-minute sessions under four conditions: tactile reinforcement (intermittent touch pressure applied to Ss shoulders as they worked); verbal reinforcement (intermittent praise by the teacher); a combination of tactile and verbal reinforcement; and control treatment (no reinforcement cues). At the end of each period, scores were calculated for each S on both attention to task and accuracy of performance. Results showed that the combination treatment was most effective in producing high attention to task and high accuracy in problem solving; that tactile and verbal reinforcement alone ranked second and third in effectiveness; and that combination, verbal, and tactile treatments were all superior to the control with the exception that verbal reinforcement alone failed to produce higher problem solving accuracy. (Author/SB)