Increasing Institutional Research Effectiveness and Productivity: Findings from a National Survey.
Saved in:
| Title: | Increasing Institutional Research Effectiveness and Productivity: Findings from a National Survey. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Huntington, Robin B., Clagett, Craig A., Maryland Univ., Baltimore. Baltimore County Campus., Prince George's Community Coll., Largo, MD. Office of Institutional Research and Analysis. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 35 |
| Publication Date: | 1991 |
| Document Type: | Numerical/Quantitative Data Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Community Colleges, Computer Uses in Education, Higher Education, Institutional Research, National Surveys, Organizational Effectiveness, Productivity, Research Administration, Research Directors, Research Problems, Research Utilization, Staff Utilization, Two Year Colleges, Universities |
| Geographic Terms: | U.S.; Maryland |
| Abstract: | In 1991, a national survey was conducted of institutional research directors at 150 two- and four-year colleges to investigate practitioner perceptions of institutional research effectiveness and productivity. Randomly selected directors of institutional research were mailed a one-page questionnaire, requesting information about institution size and type and the level, composition, and adequacy of institutional research staffing. Major findings, based on an 82% response rate, included the following: (1) four-year public institutions had the largest average staff size at nearly five full-time equivalent (FTE) positions, while four-year private institutions had the smallest average staff size (2.4 FTE) and community colleges fell in between (3 FTE); (2) the highest average ratings of adequacy were given by those directors with staffs of at least 5 FTE; (3) the most frequently cited obstacles to increasing the effectiveness of institutional research were insufficient staff, lack of appreciation of data by top administrators, and lack of an accessible, integrated database; (4) proposed means for increasing office productivity included adding more staff, better mainframe database/access, and better use of personal computer technology; and (5) techniques and tools which increased respondents' effectiveness included PC software, on-line access to mainframe files, and state-of-the-art microcomputer systems. Responses to open-ended questions regarding obstacles, increasing productivity, and techniques and tools are attached. (JMC) |
| Journal Code: | RIENOV1991 |
| Entry Date: | 1991 |
| Accession Number: | ED333944 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | In 1991, a national survey was conducted of institutional research directors at 150 two- and four-year colleges to investigate practitioner perceptions of institutional research effectiveness and productivity. Randomly selected directors of institutional research were mailed a one-page questionnaire, requesting information about institution size and type and the level, composition, and adequacy of institutional research staffing. Major findings, based on an 82% response rate, included the following: (1) four-year public institutions had the largest average staff size at nearly five full-time equivalent (FTE) positions, while four-year private institutions had the smallest average staff size (2.4 FTE) and community colleges fell in between (3 FTE); (2) the highest average ratings of adequacy were given by those directors with staffs of at least 5 FTE; (3) the most frequently cited obstacles to increasing the effectiveness of institutional research were insufficient staff, lack of appreciation of data by top administrators, and lack of an accessible, integrated database; (4) proposed means for increasing office productivity included adding more staff, better mainframe database/access, and better use of personal computer technology; and (5) techniques and tools which increased respondents' effectiveness included PC software, on-line access to mainframe files, and state-of-the-art microcomputer systems. Responses to open-ended questions regarding obstacles, increasing productivity, and techniques and tools are attached. (JMC) |
|---|
