Relations of Different Types of Numerical Magnitude Representations to Each Other and to Mathematics Achievement

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Relations of Different Types of Numerical Magnitude Representations to Each Other and to Mathematics Achievement
Language: English
Authors: Fazio, Lisa K., Bailey, Drew H., Thompson, Clarissa A., Siegler, Robert S.
Source: Grantee Submission. 2014.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 52
Publication Date: 2014
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Contract Number: R305A080013
R32C100004
R305B100001
Document Type: Information Analyses
Reports - Research
Education Level: Grade 5
Intermediate Grades
Middle Schools
Elementary Education
Descriptors: Mathematics Instruction, Mathematical Concepts, Numbers, Mathematics Achievement, Number Concepts, Symbols (Mathematics), Meta Analysis, Correlation, Knowledge Level, Number Systems, Grade 5, Elementary School Students, Elementary School Mathematics, Comprehension, Charter Schools, Computation, Standardized Tests, Scores, Reading Achievement, Reading Tests, Mathematics Tests
Geographic Terms: Pennsylvania
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.013
Abstract: We examined relations between symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude representations, between whole number and fraction representations, and between these representations and overall mathematics achievement in fifth graders. Fraction and whole number symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude understandings were measured using both magnitude comparison and number line estimation tasks. After controlling for non-mathematical cognitive proficiency, both symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude understandings were uniquely related to mathematics achievement, but the relation was much stronger for symbolic numbers. A meta-analysis of 19 published studies indicated that relations between non-symbolic numerical magnitude knowledge and mathematics achievement are present, but tend to be weak, especially beyond age six. [This article was published in: "Journal of Experimental Child Psychology" v123 p53-72 2014.]
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 55
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2015
Accession Number: ED556726
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:We examined relations between symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude representations, between whole number and fraction representations, and between these representations and overall mathematics achievement in fifth graders. Fraction and whole number symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude understandings were measured using both magnitude comparison and number line estimation tasks. After controlling for non-mathematical cognitive proficiency, both symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude understandings were uniquely related to mathematics achievement, but the relation was much stronger for symbolic numbers. A meta-analysis of 19 published studies indicated that relations between non-symbolic numerical magnitude knowledge and mathematics achievement are present, but tend to be weak, especially beyond age six. [This article was published in: "Journal of Experimental Child Psychology" v123 p53-72 2014.]
DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.013