Opening the Textbook: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2015-16

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Opening the Textbook: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2015-16
Language: English
Authors: Allen, I. Elaine, Seaman, Jeff, Babson Survey Research Group
Source: Babson Survey Research Group. 2016.
Availability: Babson Survey Research Group. Babson College, 231 Forest Street, Babson Park, MA 02457. Tel: 909-278-7389; Web site: http://www.babson.edu/Academics/centers/blank-center/global-research/Pages/babson-survey-research-group.aspx
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 75
Publication Date: 2016
Sponsoring Agency: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Document Type: Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Open Educational Resources, Textbook Selection, Higher Education, Textbooks, Educational Technology, Costs, Barriers, Copyrights, Compliance (Legal), College Faculty, Teacher Attitudes, Textbook Content, Satisfaction, Knowledge Level, Teacher Characteristics, Intellectual Disciplines, Decision Making, Media Selection, Courses, Technology Uses in Education, Online Searching
ISBN: 978-0-9840288-9-4
Abstract: The objective of this study is to better understand the process by which faculty members select the educational materials that they employ in their courses. The educational resource that people are most familiar with is the required textbook: faculty members select one or more books that all students are required to use through the duration of the course. Faculty also employ a wide range of other materials, some of which are supplemental or optional, and others that are required for all students. In addition to examining the overall resource selection process, this study also explores two particular classes of educational materials: those classified as open educational resources (OER) and a sub-set of OER known as open textbooks. The study also examines the extent to which faculty are aware of and/or adopting open textbooks. The survey results, using responses of over 3,000 U.S. faculty, show that OER is not a driving force in the selection of materials -- with the most significant barrier being the effort required to find and evaluate such materials. Use of open resources is low overall, but somewhat higher for large enrollment introductory-level courses. [For "Opening the Curriculum: Open Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2014," see ED572730.]
Abstractor: ERIC
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: ED616827
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:The objective of this study is to better understand the process by which faculty members select the educational materials that they employ in their courses. The educational resource that people are most familiar with is the required textbook: faculty members select one or more books that all students are required to use through the duration of the course. Faculty also employ a wide range of other materials, some of which are supplemental or optional, and others that are required for all students. In addition to examining the overall resource selection process, this study also explores two particular classes of educational materials: those classified as open educational resources (OER) and a sub-set of OER known as open textbooks. The study also examines the extent to which faculty are aware of and/or adopting open textbooks. The survey results, using responses of over 3,000 U.S. faculty, show that OER is not a driving force in the selection of materials -- with the most significant barrier being the effort required to find and evaluate such materials. Use of open resources is low overall, but somewhat higher for large enrollment introductory-level courses. [For "Opening the Curriculum: Open Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2014," see ED572730.]
ISBN:978-0-9840288-9-4