Performance Measurement and Resource Allocation in Higher Education in Japan: The Realization of New Public Management in Japan

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Performance Measurement and Resource Allocation in Higher Education in Japan: The Realization of New Public Management in Japan
Language: English
Authors: Takenaka, Toru, Mizuta, Kensuke, Sato, Toru
Source: Online Submission. 2022.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 22
Publication Date: 2022
Document Type: Speeches/Meeting Papers
Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Higher Education, Administrative Organization, Performance Based Assessment, Financial Support, Educational Finance, Foreign Countries, Universities, Resource Allocation, College Administration, Incentives, Institutional Evaluation, Trend Analysis
Geographic Terms: Japan
Abstract: As in many industrialized countries, Japan carried out a deregulation of higher education around the turn of the 21st century. This reform was based on New Public Management (NPM) principles, which should have been reflected in its most salient step: the incorporation of national universities in 2004. Although the way that the NPM principles were implemented in various countries was far from uniform, the Japanese version was no doubt quite peculiar. For example, from the outset, the management by objectives approach did not work well, due to deficits in the mechanism of ex-post evaluations. In addition, a roll-back of ministerial regulation emerged over time, under the guise of performance-based funding. As a result, universities rarely felt favored or promoted. Particularly in resource allocation among the institutions, they hoped for more transparency. It is assumed that this trend of re-regulation in the Japanese system will (in all likelihood) continue in the foreseeable future.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: ED619730
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:As in many industrialized countries, Japan carried out a deregulation of higher education around the turn of the 21st century. This reform was based on New Public Management (NPM) principles, which should have been reflected in its most salient step: the incorporation of national universities in 2004. Although the way that the NPM principles were implemented in various countries was far from uniform, the Japanese version was no doubt quite peculiar. For example, from the outset, the management by objectives approach did not work well, due to deficits in the mechanism of ex-post evaluations. In addition, a roll-back of ministerial regulation emerged over time, under the guise of performance-based funding. As a result, universities rarely felt favored or promoted. Particularly in resource allocation among the institutions, they hoped for more transparency. It is assumed that this trend of re-regulation in the Japanese system will (in all likelihood) continue in the foreseeable future.