Exploring an Early Numeracy Screening Measure for English Learners in Primary Grades

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Exploring an Early Numeracy Screening Measure for English Learners in Primary Grades
Language: English
Authors: Brafford, Tasia (ORCID 0000-0002-1980-6667), Clarke, Ben, Gersten, Russell M., Smolkowski, Keith, Sutherland, Marah, Dimino, Joe, Fainstein, David
Source: Grantee Submission. 2023 63:278-287.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 11
Publication Date: 2023
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Contract Number: R324B200012
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Numeracy, English Language Learners, Prediction, At Risk Students, English, Native Language, Accuracy, Outcomes of Education, Research Needs, Elementary School Students, Psychometrics, Mathematics Skills, Identification, Scores, Arithmetic, Comparative Analysis
Geographic Terms: California, Ohio
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.12.007
ISSN: 0885-2006
Abstract: We investigated the technical characteristics of a brief early numeracy screening battery for both English learners (ELs) and English proficient students (EPs). Results indicated there were differences in performance of ELs and EPs. Further, we found reasonable overall accuracy of the screener predicting student outcomes. Similar overall accuracy results were found for ELs and EPs, as well as for predicting academic performance. We discuss study results related to sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive power as they relate to implications for practice, including screening for risk for ELs and the challenge of false positives in screening systems. We conclude by proposing future avenues of research.
Abstractor: As Provided
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2023
Accession Number: ED627364
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:We investigated the technical characteristics of a brief early numeracy screening battery for both English learners (ELs) and English proficient students (EPs). Results indicated there were differences in performance of ELs and EPs. Further, we found reasonable overall accuracy of the screener predicting student outcomes. Similar overall accuracy results were found for ELs and EPs, as well as for predicting academic performance. We discuss study results related to sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive power as they relate to implications for practice, including screening for risk for ELs and the challenge of false positives in screening systems. We conclude by proposing future avenues of research.
ISSN:0885-2006
DOI:10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.12.007