Measuring Kindergarteners' Motivational Beliefs about Writing: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Alternate Assessment Formats

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Measuring Kindergarteners' Motivational Beliefs about Writing: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Alternate Assessment Formats
Language: English
Authors: Megumi E. Takada (ORCID 0000-0002-1630-4207), Christopher J. Lemons (ORCID 0000-0001-8562-7846), Lakshmi Balasubramanian (ORCID 0000-0002-3400-0936), Bonnie T. Hallman, Stephanie Al Otaiba (ORCID 0000-0001-7125-3791), Cynthia S. Puranik (ORCID 0000-0003-2787-2522)
Source: Grantee Submission. 2023.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 28
Publication Date: 2023
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Contract Number: R305A190168
R305A200397
Document Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: Early Childhood Education
Elementary Education
Kindergarten
Primary Education
Descriptors: Kindergarten, Young Children, Student Attitudes, Student Motivation, Beliefs, Writing Attitudes, Writing Evaluation, Alternative Assessment, Likert Scales, Student Surveys, Test Format, Context Effect, Positive Attitudes, Negative Attitudes
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1217085
Abstract: There have been a handful of studies on kindergarteners' motivational beliefs about writing, yet measuring these beliefs in young children continues to pose a set of challenges. The purpose of this exploratory, mixed-methods study was to examine how kindergarteners understand and respond to different assessment formats designed to capture their motivational beliefs about writing. Across two studies, we administered four assessment formats -- a 4-point Likert-type scale survey, a binary choice survey, a challenge preference task, and a semi-structured interview -- to a sample of 114 kindergarteners engaged in a larger writing intervention study. Our overall goals were to examine the benefits and challenges of using these assessment formats to capture kindergarteners' motivational beliefs and to gain insight on future directions for studying these beliefs in this young age group. Many participants had a difficult time responding to the 4-point Likert-type scale survey, due to challenges with the response format and the way the items were worded. However, more simplified assessment formats, including the binary choice survey and challenge preference task, may not have fully captured the nuances and complexities of participants' motivational beliefs. The semi-structured interview leveraged participants' voices and highlighted details that were overlooked in the other assessment formats. Participants' interview responses were deeply intertwined with their local, everyday experiences and pushed back on common assumptions of what constitutes negatively oriented motivational beliefs about writing. Overall, our results suggest that kindergarteners' motivational beliefs appear to be multifaceted, contextually grounded, and hard to quantify. Additional research is needed to further understand how motivational beliefs are shaped during kindergarten. We argue that motivational beliefs must be studied in context rather than in a vacuum, in order to work toward a fair and meaningful understanding of motivational beliefs about writing that can be applied to school settings. [This paper was published in "Frontiers in Psychology" v14 Article 1217085 2023]
Abstractor: As Provided
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: ED672593
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:There have been a handful of studies on kindergarteners' motivational beliefs about writing, yet measuring these beliefs in young children continues to pose a set of challenges. The purpose of this exploratory, mixed-methods study was to examine how kindergarteners understand and respond to different assessment formats designed to capture their motivational beliefs about writing. Across two studies, we administered four assessment formats -- a 4-point Likert-type scale survey, a binary choice survey, a challenge preference task, and a semi-structured interview -- to a sample of 114 kindergarteners engaged in a larger writing intervention study. Our overall goals were to examine the benefits and challenges of using these assessment formats to capture kindergarteners' motivational beliefs and to gain insight on future directions for studying these beliefs in this young age group. Many participants had a difficult time responding to the 4-point Likert-type scale survey, due to challenges with the response format and the way the items were worded. However, more simplified assessment formats, including the binary choice survey and challenge preference task, may not have fully captured the nuances and complexities of participants' motivational beliefs. The semi-structured interview leveraged participants' voices and highlighted details that were overlooked in the other assessment formats. Participants' interview responses were deeply intertwined with their local, everyday experiences and pushed back on common assumptions of what constitutes negatively oriented motivational beliefs about writing. Overall, our results suggest that kindergarteners' motivational beliefs appear to be multifaceted, contextually grounded, and hard to quantify. Additional research is needed to further understand how motivational beliefs are shaped during kindergarten. We argue that motivational beliefs must be studied in context rather than in a vacuum, in order to work toward a fair and meaningful understanding of motivational beliefs about writing that can be applied to school settings. [This paper was published in "Frontiers in Psychology" v14 Article 1217085 2023]
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1217085