Validity and Bias of Academic Achievement Measures in the First Year of Elementary School

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Validity and Bias of Academic Achievement Measures in the First Year of Elementary School
Language: English
Authors: Hammes, Patricia Simone, Bigras, Marc, Crepaldi, Maria Aparecida
Source: International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2016 39(1):3-18.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 16
Publication Date: 2016
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education
Grade 1
Primary Education
Early Childhood Education
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Academic Achievement, Validity, Bias, Elementary School Students, Elementary School Teachers, Achievement Tests, Teacher Evaluation, Rating Scales, Family Characteristics, Teacher Characteristics, Student Characteristics, Grade 1, Emotional Adjustment, Social Adjustment, Socioeconomic Status, School Readiness, Predictor Variables, Comparative Analysis, Anxiety, Standardized Tests, Measures (Individuals)
Geographic Terms: Canada
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Teacher Rating Scale
DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2014.933473
ISSN: 1743-727X
Abstract: We tested the criterion-related validity and potential bias of two measures of pupils' academic achievement: the Teacher Rating Scale (TRS) and the Mathematics and Literacy Achievement Tests (MLTs). These measures are representative of assessment methods largely used in the elementary school. The aims were: (1) to verify the extent to which TRS and MLTs can be predicted by external criteria collected at kindergarten and (2) to estimate the degree to which each measure might be biased by family, teacher and children's characteristics. A total of 239 children were assessed during kindergarten. At the end of the first grade, they were tested for social-emotional adjustment and academic achievement (TRS and MLTs). Results suggest that family socioeconomic status and children's school readiness at kindergarten were associated with both measures; however, the predictors accounted for significantly more variance in TRS than in MLTs. Regarding the presence of bias, results indicate that TRS seems more sensitive to children's social competence, whereas the MLTs appears to be more sensitive to pupils' anxiety.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 63
Entry Date: 2015
Accession Number: EJ1082303
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:We tested the criterion-related validity and potential bias of two measures of pupils' academic achievement: the Teacher Rating Scale (TRS) and the Mathematics and Literacy Achievement Tests (MLTs). These measures are representative of assessment methods largely used in the elementary school. The aims were: (1) to verify the extent to which TRS and MLTs can be predicted by external criteria collected at kindergarten and (2) to estimate the degree to which each measure might be biased by family, teacher and children's characteristics. A total of 239 children were assessed during kindergarten. At the end of the first grade, they were tested for social-emotional adjustment and academic achievement (TRS and MLTs). Results suggest that family socioeconomic status and children's school readiness at kindergarten were associated with both measures; however, the predictors accounted for significantly more variance in TRS than in MLTs. Regarding the presence of bias, results indicate that TRS seems more sensitive to children's social competence, whereas the MLTs appears to be more sensitive to pupils' anxiety.
ISSN:1743-727X
DOI:10.1080/1743727X.2014.933473