The Minimal Control Principle Predicts Strategy Shifts in the Abstract Decision Making Task

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Minimal Control Principle Predicts Strategy Shifts in the Abstract Decision Making Task
Language: English
Authors: Taatgen, Niels A.
Source: Journal of Problem Solving. Feb 2011 3(2):151-166.
Availability: Purdue University Press. Stewart Center Room 370, 504 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Tel: 800-247-6553; Fax: 419-281-6883; e-mail: pupress@purdue,edu; Web site: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jps/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 16
Publication Date: 2011
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Problem Solving, Abstract Reasoning, Decision Making, Learning Strategies, Self Control, Self Reward, Individual Differences, Executive Function, Prediction, Games, Classification, College Students, Experiments, Difficulty Level
Geographic Terms: Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh)
DOI: 10.7771/1932-6246.1095
ISSN: 1932-6246
Abstract: The minimal control principle (Taatgen, 2007) predicts that people strive for problem-solving strategies that require as few internal control states as possible. In an experiment with the Abstract Decision Making task (ADM task; Joslyn & Hunt, 1998) the reward structure was manipulated to make either a low-control strategy or a high-strategy more feasible. The results show that most participants are sensitive to the shifting demands of the task, consistent with the minimal control principle, but also that individual differences are large.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 24
Entry Date: 2016
Accession Number: EJ1115829
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:The minimal control principle (Taatgen, 2007) predicts that people strive for problem-solving strategies that require as few internal control states as possible. In an experiment with the Abstract Decision Making task (ADM task; Joslyn & Hunt, 1998) the reward structure was manipulated to make either a low-control strategy or a high-strategy more feasible. The results show that most participants are sensitive to the shifting demands of the task, consistent with the minimal control principle, but also that individual differences are large.
ISSN:1932-6246
DOI:10.7771/1932-6246.1095