Stakeholder Perspectives on Creating and Maintaining Trust in Community--Academic Research Partnerships

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Stakeholder Perspectives on Creating and Maintaining Trust in Community--Academic Research Partnerships
Language: English
Authors: Frerichs, Leah, Kim, Mimi, Dave, Gaurav, Cheney, Ann, Hassmiller Lich, Kristen, Jones, Jennifer, Young, Tiffany L., Cene, Crystal W., Varma, Deepthi S., Schaal, Jennifer, Black, Adina, Striley, Catherine W., Vassar, Stefanie, Sullivan, Greer, Cottler, Linda B., Brown, Arleen, Burke, Jessica G., Corbie-Smith, Giselle
Source: Health Education & Behavior. Feb 2017 44(1):182-191.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 10
Publication Date: 2017
Sponsoring Agency: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) (DHHS/NIH)
National Institutes of Health (DHHS)
Contract Number: UL1TR000039
UL1TR000124
UL1TR000064
UL1TR001111
UL1TR000005
K24HL105493
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Cooperative Planning, Research, Stakeholders, Trust (Psychology), Mixed Methods Research, Concept Mapping, Allied Health Personnel, Researchers, Community Involvement, Likert Scales, Interpersonal Communication, Interpersonal Relationship, Sustainability, Problem Solving, Brainstorming
Geographic Terms: North Carolina, Florida, Arkansas, California (Los Angeles)
DOI: 10.1177/1090198116648291
ISSN: 1090-1981
Abstract: Community-academic research partnerships aim to build stakeholder trust in order to improve the reach and translation of health research, but there is limited empirical research regarding effective ways to build trust. This multisite study was launched to identify similarities and differences among stakeholders' perspectives of antecedents to trust in research partnerships. In 2013-2014, we conducted a mixed-methods concept mapping study with participants from three major stakeholder groups who identified and rated the importance of different antecedents of trust on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Study participants were community members (n = 66), health care providers (n = 38), and academic researchers (n = 44). All stakeholder groups rated "authentic communication" and "reciprocal relationships" the highest in importance. Community members rated "communication/methodology to resolve problems" (M = 4.23, SD = 0.58) significantly higher than academic researchers (M = 3.87, SD = 0.67) and health care providers (M = 3.89, SD = 0.62; p < .01) and had different perspectives regarding the importance of issues related to "sustainability." The importance of communication and relationships across stakeholders indicates the importance of colearning processes that involve the exchange of knowledge and skills. The differences uncovered suggest specific areas where attention and skill building may be needed to improve trust within partnerships. More research on how partnerships can improve communication specific to problem solving and sustainability is merited.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 49
Entry Date: 2017
Accession Number: EJ1129136
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Community-academic research partnerships aim to build stakeholder trust in order to improve the reach and translation of health research, but there is limited empirical research regarding effective ways to build trust. This multisite study was launched to identify similarities and differences among stakeholders' perspectives of antecedents to trust in research partnerships. In 2013-2014, we conducted a mixed-methods concept mapping study with participants from three major stakeholder groups who identified and rated the importance of different antecedents of trust on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Study participants were community members (n = 66), health care providers (n = 38), and academic researchers (n = 44). All stakeholder groups rated "authentic communication" and "reciprocal relationships" the highest in importance. Community members rated "communication/methodology to resolve problems" (M = 4.23, SD = 0.58) significantly higher than academic researchers (M = 3.87, SD = 0.67) and health care providers (M = 3.89, SD = 0.62; p < .01) and had different perspectives regarding the importance of issues related to "sustainability." The importance of communication and relationships across stakeholders indicates the importance of colearning processes that involve the exchange of knowledge and skills. The differences uncovered suggest specific areas where attention and skill building may be needed to improve trust within partnerships. More research on how partnerships can improve communication specific to problem solving and sustainability is merited.
ISSN:1090-1981
DOI:10.1177/1090198116648291