One Size Does Not Fit All: A Critical Race Theory Perspective on College Rankings
Saved in:
| Title: | One Size Does Not Fit All: A Critical Race Theory Perspective on College Rankings |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Richards, David A. R., Awokoya, Janet T., Bridges, Brian K., Clark, Christine |
| Source: | Review of Higher Education. Fall 2018 42(1):269-312. |
| Availability: | Johns Hopkins University Press. 2715 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. Tel: 800-548-1784; Tel: 410-516-6987; Fax: 410-516-6968; e-mail: jlorder@jhupress.jhu.edu; Web site: http://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/subscribe.html |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 44 |
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Evaluative |
| Education Level: | Higher Education |
| Descriptors: | Critical Theory, Race, Equal Education, Institutional Characteristics, Achievement Rating, Reputation, Higher Education, Racial Bias, Evaluation Criteria, Scores, Disproportionate Representation, Minority Group Students, Academic Achievement, Black Colleges, Hispanic American Students, Periodicals, African American Students, College Students |
| DOI: | 10.1353/rhe.2018.0030 |
| ISSN: | 0162-5748 |
| Abstract: | Critical Race Theory contends that institutions codify and sustain racial inequalities even absent explicitly racist motives or actions. College ranking systems perpetuate such institutional racism by socially constructing minority-serving institutions (MSIs) as less valuable and prestigious. By assigning greater worth to criteria favoring more selective institutions, ranking systems assign lower scores to institutions enrolling higher percentages of underrepresented students. The authors compared three higher education institution ranking systems' appraisals of MSIs. These systems employ varying methodological approaches to classifying college status, with apparent impacts on MSIs' performances. Implications of these rankings on the standings and fortunes of MSIs are considered. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 88 |
| Entry Date: | 2018 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1193658 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Critical Race Theory contends that institutions codify and sustain racial inequalities even absent explicitly racist motives or actions. College ranking systems perpetuate such institutional racism by socially constructing minority-serving institutions (MSIs) as less valuable and prestigious. By assigning greater worth to criteria favoring more selective institutions, ranking systems assign lower scores to institutions enrolling higher percentages of underrepresented students. The authors compared three higher education institution ranking systems' appraisals of MSIs. These systems employ varying methodological approaches to classifying college status, with apparent impacts on MSIs' performances. Implications of these rankings on the standings and fortunes of MSIs are considered. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0162-5748 |
| DOI: | 10.1353/rhe.2018.0030 |
