What Methods of Scoring Young Children's Spelling Best Predict Later Spelling Performance?
Saved in:
| Title: | What Methods of Scoring Young Children's Spelling Best Predict Later Spelling Performance? |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Treiman, Rebecca (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Research in Reading. Feb 2019 42(1):80-96. |
| Availability: | Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 17 |
| Publication Date: | 2019 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Science Foundation (NSF) National Institutes of Health (DHHS) |
| Contract Number: | BCS1421279 HD051610 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education |
| Descriptors: | Spelling, Scoring, Predictor Variables, Elementary School Students, Standardized Tests, Phonology, Measures (Individuals), Evaluation Methods, Error Patterns |
| DOI: | 10.1111/1467-9817.12241 |
| ISSN: | 0141-0423 |
| Abstract: | Background: Children's spellings are often scored as correct or incorrect, but other measures may be better predictors of later spelling performance. Method: We examined seven measures of spelling in Reception Year and Year 1 (5-6 years old) as predictors of performance on a standardised spelling test in Year 2 (age 7). Results: Correctness was the best predictor of later spelling by the middle of Year 1, and it significantly outperformed a binary measure of phonological plausibility at the end of Reception Year. Nonbinary measures based on Levenshtein distance were significant predictors of later spelling in the middle of Reception Year and in children who produced no correct spellings. Some widely used scales performed less well with children who did not yet produce any correct spellings. Conclusions: Nonbinary measures of spelling performance can predict later spelling performance but for a more restricted period than anticipated based on many theories. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2019 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1203380 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Background: Children's spellings are often scored as correct or incorrect, but other measures may be better predictors of later spelling performance. Method: We examined seven measures of spelling in Reception Year and Year 1 (5-6 years old) as predictors of performance on a standardised spelling test in Year 2 (age 7). Results: Correctness was the best predictor of later spelling by the middle of Year 1, and it significantly outperformed a binary measure of phonological plausibility at the end of Reception Year. Nonbinary measures based on Levenshtein distance were significant predictors of later spelling in the middle of Reception Year and in children who produced no correct spellings. Some widely used scales performed less well with children who did not yet produce any correct spellings. Conclusions: Nonbinary measures of spelling performance can predict later spelling performance but for a more restricted period than anticipated based on many theories. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0141-0423 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/1467-9817.12241 |
