Disentangling the Research Literature on 'Number Sense': Three Constructs, One Name
Saved in:
| Title: | Disentangling the Research Literature on 'Number Sense': Three Constructs, One Name |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Whitacre, Ian, Henning, Bonnie, Ataba?, ?ebnem |
| Source: | Review of Educational Research. Feb 2020 90(1):95-134. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 40 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Number Concepts, Number Systems, Literature Reviews, Educational Research, Fundamental Concepts, Correlation, Social Sciences, Behavioral Sciences |
| DOI: | 10.3102/0034654319899706 |
| ISSN: | 0034-6543 |
| Abstract: | In this article, we review research literature concerning number sense from several related fields. Whereas other authors have pointed to difficulty defining number sense or to some degree of inconsistency in the literature, we argue instead that this is a case of polysemy: three constructs given the same name. Our purpose is to clarify the research literature concerning number sense by naming and defining these three constructs, identifying similarities and differences among them, categorizing the research traditions associated with each construct, and summarizing the methods used and findings reported. We compare and contrast themes in each body of literature by drawing on a sample of 141 research articles that were focused on number sense. We find evidence that there is confusion of number sense constructs across research traditions. We emphasize the need for clarity in order for research in each of these traditions to progress. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2020 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1241931 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | In this article, we review research literature concerning number sense from several related fields. Whereas other authors have pointed to difficulty defining number sense or to some degree of inconsistency in the literature, we argue instead that this is a case of polysemy: three constructs given the same name. Our purpose is to clarify the research literature concerning number sense by naming and defining these three constructs, identifying similarities and differences among them, categorizing the research traditions associated with each construct, and summarizing the methods used and findings reported. We compare and contrast themes in each body of literature by drawing on a sample of 141 research articles that were focused on number sense. We find evidence that there is confusion of number sense constructs across research traditions. We emphasize the need for clarity in order for research in each of these traditions to progress. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0034-6543 |
| DOI: | 10.3102/0034654319899706 |
