The Use of Mathematical Modeling Studies for Evidence Synthesis and Guideline Development: A Glossary

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Use of Mathematical Modeling Studies for Evidence Synthesis and Guideline Development: A Glossary
Language: English
Authors: Porgo, Teegwendé V. (ORCID 0000-0003-0298-0711), Norris, Susan L. (ORCID 0000-0002-0042-2452), Salanti, Georgia (ORCID 0000-0002-3830-8508), Johnson, Leigh F., Simpson, Julie A. (ORCID 0000-0002-2660-2013), Low, Nicola (ORCID 0000-0003-4817-8986), Egger, Matthias (ORCID 0000-0001-7462-5132), Althaus, Christian L. (ORCID 0000-0002-5230-6760)
Source: Research Synthesis Methods. Mar 2019 10(1):125-133.
Availability: Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 9
Publication Date: 2019
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reference Materials - Vocabularies/Classifications
Reports - Descriptive
Descriptors: Mathematical Models, Evidence, Glossaries, Medical Research, Epidemiology, Guidelines, Medicine, Public Health
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1333
ISSN: 1759-2879
Abstract: Mathematical modeling studies are increasingly recognised as an important tool for evidence synthesis and to inform clinical and public health decision-making, particularly when data from systematic reviews of primary studies do not adequately answer a research question. However, systematic reviewers and guideline developers may struggle with using the results of modeling studies, because, at least in part, of the lack of a common understanding of concepts and terminology between evidence synthesis experts and mathematical modellers. The use of a common terminology for modeling studies across different clinical and epidemiological research fields that span infectious and non-communicable diseases will help systematic reviewers and guideline developers with the understanding, characterisation, comparison, and use of mathematical modeling studies. This glossary explains key terms used in mathematical modeling studies that are particularly salient to evidence synthesis and knowledge translation in clinical medicine and public health.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2020
Accession Number: EJ1254442
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Mathematical modeling studies are increasingly recognised as an important tool for evidence synthesis and to inform clinical and public health decision-making, particularly when data from systematic reviews of primary studies do not adequately answer a research question. However, systematic reviewers and guideline developers may struggle with using the results of modeling studies, because, at least in part, of the lack of a common understanding of concepts and terminology between evidence synthesis experts and mathematical modellers. The use of a common terminology for modeling studies across different clinical and epidemiological research fields that span infectious and non-communicable diseases will help systematic reviewers and guideline developers with the understanding, characterisation, comparison, and use of mathematical modeling studies. This glossary explains key terms used in mathematical modeling studies that are particularly salient to evidence synthesis and knowledge translation in clinical medicine and public health.
ISSN:1759-2879
DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1333