The Relation of Articulatory and Vocal Auditory-Motor Control in Typical Speakers
Saved in:
| Title: | The Relation of Articulatory and Vocal Auditory-Motor Control in Typical Speakers |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Lester-Smith, Rosemary A. (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. Nov 2020 63(11):3628-3642. |
| Availability: | American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2200 Research Blvd #250, Rockville, MD 20850. Tel: 301-296-5700; Fax: 301-296-8580; e-mail: slhr@asha.org; Web site: http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) (DHHS/ACL) |
| Contract Number: | DC015570 DC016270 DC015446 DC017001 90AR5015 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Articulation (Speech), Auditory Perception, Speech Communication, Acoustics, Vowels, Responses, Error Correction, Females, Psychomotor Skills |
| DOI: | 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00192 |
| ISSN: | 1092-4388 |
| Abstract: | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between feedback and feedforward control of articulation and voice by measuring reflexive and adaptive responses to first formant (F[subscript 1]) and fundamental frequency (f[subscript o]) perturbations. In addition, perception of F[subscript 1] and f[subscript o] perturbation was estimated using passive (listening) and active (speaking) just noticeable difference paradigms to assess the relation of auditory acuity to reflexive and adaptive responses. Method: Twenty healthy women produced single words and sustained vowels while the F[subscript 1] or f[subscript o] of their auditory feedback was suddenly and unpredictably perturbed to assess reflexive responses or gradually and predictably perturbed to assess adaptive responses. Results: Typical speakers' reflexive responses to sudden perturbation of F[subscript 1] were related to their adaptive responses to gradual perturbation of F[subscript 1]. Specifically, speakers with larger reflexive responses to sudden perturbation of F[subscript 1] had larger adaptive responses to gradual perturbation of F[subscript 1]. Furthermore, their reflexive responses to sudden perturbation of F[subscript 1] were associated with their passive auditory acuity to F[subscript 1] such that speakers with better auditory acuity to F[subscript 1] produced larger reflexive responses to sudden perturbations of F[subscript 1]. Typical speakers' adaptive responses to gradual perturbation of F[subscript 1] were not associated with their auditory acuity to F[subscript 1]. Speakers' reflexive and adaptive responses to perturbation of f[subscript o] were not related, nor were their responses related to either measure of auditory acuity to f[subscript o]. Conclusion: These findings indicate that there may be disparate feedback and feedforward control mechanisms for articulatory and vocal error correction based on auditory feedback. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2021 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1280802 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between feedback and feedforward control of articulation and voice by measuring reflexive and adaptive responses to first formant (F[subscript 1]) and fundamental frequency (f[subscript o]) perturbations. In addition, perception of F[subscript 1] and f[subscript o] perturbation was estimated using passive (listening) and active (speaking) just noticeable difference paradigms to assess the relation of auditory acuity to reflexive and adaptive responses. Method: Twenty healthy women produced single words and sustained vowels while the F[subscript 1] or f[subscript o] of their auditory feedback was suddenly and unpredictably perturbed to assess reflexive responses or gradually and predictably perturbed to assess adaptive responses. Results: Typical speakers' reflexive responses to sudden perturbation of F[subscript 1] were related to their adaptive responses to gradual perturbation of F[subscript 1]. Specifically, speakers with larger reflexive responses to sudden perturbation of F[subscript 1] had larger adaptive responses to gradual perturbation of F[subscript 1]. Furthermore, their reflexive responses to sudden perturbation of F[subscript 1] were associated with their passive auditory acuity to F[subscript 1] such that speakers with better auditory acuity to F[subscript 1] produced larger reflexive responses to sudden perturbations of F[subscript 1]. Typical speakers' adaptive responses to gradual perturbation of F[subscript 1] were not associated with their auditory acuity to F[subscript 1]. Speakers' reflexive and adaptive responses to perturbation of f[subscript o] were not related, nor were their responses related to either measure of auditory acuity to f[subscript o]. Conclusion: These findings indicate that there may be disparate feedback and feedforward control mechanisms for articulatory and vocal error correction based on auditory feedback. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1092-4388 |
| DOI: | 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00192 |
