Who Gets Coached? A Qualitative Inquiry into Community Clinicians' Decisions to Use Caregiver Coaching

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Who Gets Coached? A Qualitative Inquiry into Community Clinicians' Decisions to Use Caregiver Coaching
Language: English
Authors: Tomczuk, Liza (ORCID 0000-0002-6384-5698), Stewart, Rebecca E., Beidas, Rinad S., Mandell, David S., Pellecchia, Melanie
Source: Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice. Apr 2022 26(3):575-585.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 11
Publication Date: 2022
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) (DHHS/NIH)
Contract Number: R324B180017
MH118489
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Caregiver Training, Family Influence, Evidence Based Practice, Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Early Intervention, Minority Groups, Family Characteristics, Beliefs, Social Bias, Young Children, Coaching (Performance), Socioeconomic Background, Low Income
Geographic Terms: Pennsylvania, California, Delaware
DOI: 10.1177/13623613211059499
ISSN: 1362-3613
1461-7005
Abstract: Clinicians' beliefs about an intervention's fit with an individual family influence whether they use it with that family. The factors that influence clinicians' decisions to implement evidence-based practices for young autistic children have yet to be evaluated systematically. These factors may partially account for the significant disparities in quality of and access to early intervention. We examined disparities in clinicians' reported use of caregiver coaching, an evidence-based practice, with families from minoritized or structurally marginalized groups, and the perceived reasons for those disparities, to assess the factors that influence clinicians' use of caregiver coaching. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 36 early intervention clinicians from publicly funded early intervention agencies in two distinct geographic regions in the United States. Clinicians identified social and structural factors, including perceived family characteristics and stigma, that influenced their beliefs about the fit of coaching with families from minoritized or structurally marginalized groups. These findings point to the presence of beliefs that likely exacerbate disparities in access to evidence-based practices and reduce the quality of care for minoritized families of young autistic children. These findings highlight the need to develop and deploy equity-focused implementation strategies to improve both access to and quality of evidence-based practices for young autistic children from minoritized groups. [For the corresponding grantee submission, see ED618068.]
Abstractor: As Provided
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: EJ1333631
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Clinicians' beliefs about an intervention's fit with an individual family influence whether they use it with that family. The factors that influence clinicians' decisions to implement evidence-based practices for young autistic children have yet to be evaluated systematically. These factors may partially account for the significant disparities in quality of and access to early intervention. We examined disparities in clinicians' reported use of caregiver coaching, an evidence-based practice, with families from minoritized or structurally marginalized groups, and the perceived reasons for those disparities, to assess the factors that influence clinicians' use of caregiver coaching. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 36 early intervention clinicians from publicly funded early intervention agencies in two distinct geographic regions in the United States. Clinicians identified social and structural factors, including perceived family characteristics and stigma, that influenced their beliefs about the fit of coaching with families from minoritized or structurally marginalized groups. These findings point to the presence of beliefs that likely exacerbate disparities in access to evidence-based practices and reduce the quality of care for minoritized families of young autistic children. These findings highlight the need to develop and deploy equity-focused implementation strategies to improve both access to and quality of evidence-based practices for young autistic children from minoritized groups. [For the corresponding grantee submission, see ED618068.]
ISSN:1362-3613
1461-7005
DOI:10.1177/13623613211059499