Mergers in Higher Education: It's Not Easy. Merger of Two Disparate Institutions and the Impact on Faculty Research Productivity

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Mergers in Higher Education: It's Not Easy. Merger of Two Disparate Institutions and the Impact on Faculty Research Productivity
Language: English
Authors: Slade, Catherine P., Ribando, Saundra, Fortner, C. Kevin, Walker, Kristin V.
Source: Studies in Higher Education. 2022 47(6):1215-1226.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2022
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Universities, Organizational Change, College Faculty, Research, Researchers, Productivity, Faculty Publishing, Professional Identity, Stress Variables
Geographic Terms: Georgia
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1870948
ISSN: 0307-5079
1470-174X
Abstract: Despite the growing popularity of mergers in higher education, limited research examines their sociocultural impact on faculty which is arguably a university's most valuable resource. This paper examines a merger of disparate institutions in the University System of Georgia (USG) and presents faculty research productivity results over time, given that increased research presence for the merged university was a goal for the merger. A sociocultural based quantitative methods approach was used to explore faculty research efforts and productivity in the merged university. Surveys of faculty were conducted three times over five years post-merger. Research effort and productivity were analysed. The findings suggest that merging two disparate institutions to expand the primary mission of the higher status legacy institution, in this case research and scholarship, requires greater attention to cultural differences between the legacy institutions to the merger. The merged university experienced a consistent reduction in research following the merger, with the most pronounced productivity decline university-wide by year five. With this research, we provide guidance for administrators of higher education institutions and policy makers considering university mergers as a means to encourage research, among other priorities.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: EJ1352589
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Despite the growing popularity of mergers in higher education, limited research examines their sociocultural impact on faculty which is arguably a university's most valuable resource. This paper examines a merger of disparate institutions in the University System of Georgia (USG) and presents faculty research productivity results over time, given that increased research presence for the merged university was a goal for the merger. A sociocultural based quantitative methods approach was used to explore faculty research efforts and productivity in the merged university. Surveys of faculty were conducted three times over five years post-merger. Research effort and productivity were analysed. The findings suggest that merging two disparate institutions to expand the primary mission of the higher status legacy institution, in this case research and scholarship, requires greater attention to cultural differences between the legacy institutions to the merger. The merged university experienced a consistent reduction in research following the merger, with the most pronounced productivity decline university-wide by year five. With this research, we provide guidance for administrators of higher education institutions and policy makers considering university mergers as a means to encourage research, among other priorities.
ISSN:0307-5079
1470-174X
DOI:10.1080/03075079.2020.1870948