Measuring Being 'Developmentally on Track': Comparing Direct Assessment and Caregiver Report of Early Childhood Development in Bangladesh, China, India and Myanmar

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Measuring Being 'Developmentally on Track': Comparing Direct Assessment and Caregiver Report of Early Childhood Development in Bangladesh, China, India and Myanmar
Language: English
Authors: Rao, Nirmala (ORCID 0000-0002-5695-3156), Chan, Stephanie W. Y. (ORCID 0000-0001-8779-1164), Su, Yufen (ORCID 0000-0002-9423-5753), Richards, Ben (ORCID 0000-0002-8809-9097), Cappa, Claudia (ORCID 0000-0003-4636-7652), De Castro, E. Filipa, Petrowski, Nicole
Source: Early Education and Development. 2022 33(6):1013-1035.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 23
Publication Date: 2022
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Child Development, Preschool Children, Age Differences, Mothers, Parent Background, Educational Attainment, Socioeconomic Status, Sustainable Development, Caregiver Attitudes, Evaluation Methods, Parent Attitudes, Scores, Correlation, Cultural Differences
Geographic Terms: Bangladesh, China, India, Burma
DOI: 10.1080/10409289.2021.1928446
ISSN: 1040-9289
1556-6935
Abstract: Assessment of progress toward UN Sustainable Development Goal 4 requires measurement of the proportion of children aged 24 to 59 months developmentally on track in health, learning, and psychosocial well-being (Indicator 4.2.1). UNICEF's methodological work culminated with the development of the Early Childhood Development Index 2030 (ECDI2030) to measure on track status. To compare direct assessment and caregiver report of early child development, a measure aligned to ECDI2030 -- the Early Childhood Development Assessment Scale-Direct Assessment (ECDAS-DA) -- was developed and administered to 510 preschoolers aged 36- to 59-months from Bangladesh, China, India, and Myanmar. Their caregivers completed the Early Childhood Development Assessment Scale-Caregiver Survey (ECDAS-CS) containing items based on the ECDI2030. Research Findings: The two measures correlated with each other and were associated with child age, maternal education, and family wealth. ECDAS-DA showed more variability by child age and provided more fine-grained analyses of emerging developmental competencies than ECDAS-CS. Practice or Policy: Given the dearth of pan-culturally appropriate tools, ECDAS-DA can be deployed in longitudinal studies and impact evaluations in low- and middle-income countries.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: EJ1357346
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Assessment of progress toward UN Sustainable Development Goal 4 requires measurement of the proportion of children aged 24 to 59 months developmentally on track in health, learning, and psychosocial well-being (Indicator 4.2.1). UNICEF's methodological work culminated with the development of the Early Childhood Development Index 2030 (ECDI2030) to measure on track status. To compare direct assessment and caregiver report of early child development, a measure aligned to ECDI2030 -- the Early Childhood Development Assessment Scale-Direct Assessment (ECDAS-DA) -- was developed and administered to 510 preschoolers aged 36- to 59-months from Bangladesh, China, India, and Myanmar. Their caregivers completed the Early Childhood Development Assessment Scale-Caregiver Survey (ECDAS-CS) containing items based on the ECDI2030. Research Findings: The two measures correlated with each other and were associated with child age, maternal education, and family wealth. ECDAS-DA showed more variability by child age and provided more fine-grained analyses of emerging developmental competencies than ECDAS-CS. Practice or Policy: Given the dearth of pan-culturally appropriate tools, ECDAS-DA can be deployed in longitudinal studies and impact evaluations in low- and middle-income countries.
ISSN:1040-9289
1556-6935
DOI:10.1080/10409289.2021.1928446