How to Make More Valid Decisions about Assessment Data
Saved in:
| Title: | How to Make More Valid Decisions about Assessment Data |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Thompson, Greg, Rutkowski, Leslie, Rutkowski, David |
| Source: | Phi Delta Kappan. Mar 2023 104(6):34-39. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 6 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Education Level: | Elementary Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Validity, Decision Making, Data Use, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Data Analysis |
| DOI: | 10.1177/00317217231161538 |
| ISSN: | 0031-7217 1940-6487 |
| Abstract: | Those asked to make valid decisions with data don't have the technical knowledge to understand nuance around data quality, assessment aims, and statistical limitations that influence how they should interpret the data. This reality is what Greg Thompson, Leslie Rutkowski, and David Rutkowski call the validity paradox. Educators can surmount this paradox by following a five-step model in which they make a claim, make the opposite claim, and then determine how well both claims are supported by the available evidence. This process can enable practicing educators to make more valid decisions based on data. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1369908 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Those asked to make valid decisions with data don't have the technical knowledge to understand nuance around data quality, assessment aims, and statistical limitations that influence how they should interpret the data. This reality is what Greg Thompson, Leslie Rutkowski, and David Rutkowski call the validity paradox. Educators can surmount this paradox by following a five-step model in which they make a claim, make the opposite claim, and then determine how well both claims are supported by the available evidence. This process can enable practicing educators to make more valid decisions based on data. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0031-7217 1940-6487 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/00317217231161538 |