Involuntary Autobiographical Memories: The Question of Function

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Involuntary Autobiographical Memories: The Question of Function
Language: English
Authors: Mace, John H. (ORCID 0000-0002-4904-6865), Zhu, Jian, Kruchten, Emilee A., McNally, Kevin
Source: Applied Cognitive Psychology. May-Jun 2023 37(3):600-611.
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2023
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Memory, Recall (Psychology), Autobiographies, Cognitive Processes, Responses, Informed Consent, Cognitive Objectives
DOI: 10.1002/acp.4069
ISSN: 0888-4080
1099-0720
Abstract: Research on involuntary autobiographical memories has made significant progress over the past two decades. One question in this area concerns whether involuntary memories are functional, or merely cognitive failures. Survey methods have been used to assess the question of involuntary memory functionality, but with mixed results, with some suggesting that most involuntary memories are functional, and others suggesting the opposite. In this study, we argued that the variable findings were due to differences in survey design. In Study 1, we showed that closed-ended questionnaires on function (where participants select from a number of function choices) produce significantly more positive function responses than open-ended questionnaires (where participants freely articulate perceived functions). Study 2 showed that allowing participants to select more than one function greatly inflated positive function responses. We used these findings to outline a number of possible answers to the question of involuntary memory functions.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2023
Accession Number: EJ1377040
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Research on involuntary autobiographical memories has made significant progress over the past two decades. One question in this area concerns whether involuntary memories are functional, or merely cognitive failures. Survey methods have been used to assess the question of involuntary memory functionality, but with mixed results, with some suggesting that most involuntary memories are functional, and others suggesting the opposite. In this study, we argued that the variable findings were due to differences in survey design. In Study 1, we showed that closed-ended questionnaires on function (where participants select from a number of function choices) produce significantly more positive function responses than open-ended questionnaires (where participants freely articulate perceived functions). Study 2 showed that allowing participants to select more than one function greatly inflated positive function responses. We used these findings to outline a number of possible answers to the question of involuntary memory functions.
ISSN:0888-4080
1099-0720
DOI:10.1002/acp.4069