The Spatial Metaphors of Transfer
Saved in:
| Title: | The Spatial Metaphors of Transfer |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Becker, Tim |
| Source: | Composition Forum. Spr 2023 51. |
| Availability: | Association of Teachers of Advanced Composition. e-mail: cf@compositionforum.com; Web site: http://compositionforum.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Transfer of Training, Figurative Language, Metacognition, Learning Processes, Language Usage, Writing (Composition), Cognitive Processes, Context Effect |
| ISSN: | 1522-7502 |
| Abstract: | While "transfer" remains the dominant yet controversial metaphor for describing how learning from one context affects learning in another, writing scholars propose numerous alternatives better aligned with current models of learning in "consequential transitions," "boundary crossing," and "threshold concepts;" however, each shares a pervasive epistemic constraint: a systematic metaphor that frames transfer as "transportation." Drawing on Lakoff and Johnsen, I identify four dimensions of spatiality as transfer's experiential bases: physical, technological, social, and temporal. I argue that "transfer" entails metrics of distance biased towards unilateral transitions and traditional educational trajectories, and it objectifies learning, perpetuating outmoded theories of language, mind, and transfer. I support calls to replace "transfer" with a more generative metaphor, turning needed attention to pragmatic issues of uptake and circulation. However, contending that terminological change is not enough to mitigate its entailments, I propose conventionalizing mindfulness of the metaphor via existing processes and practices of disciplinary enculturation. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Access URL: | https://www.compositionforum.com/issue/51/spatial-metaphors.php |
| Accession Number: | EJ1389514 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | While "transfer" remains the dominant yet controversial metaphor for describing how learning from one context affects learning in another, writing scholars propose numerous alternatives better aligned with current models of learning in "consequential transitions," "boundary crossing," and "threshold concepts;" however, each shares a pervasive epistemic constraint: a systematic metaphor that frames transfer as "transportation." Drawing on Lakoff and Johnsen, I identify four dimensions of spatiality as transfer's experiential bases: physical, technological, social, and temporal. I argue that "transfer" entails metrics of distance biased towards unilateral transitions and traditional educational trajectories, and it objectifies learning, perpetuating outmoded theories of language, mind, and transfer. I support calls to replace "transfer" with a more generative metaphor, turning needed attention to pragmatic issues of uptake and circulation. However, contending that terminological change is not enough to mitigate its entailments, I propose conventionalizing mindfulness of the metaphor via existing processes and practices of disciplinary enculturation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1522-7502 |
