Type and Dosage of Performance Feedback Following COMPASS Consultation on Teacher and Student Outcomes

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Type and Dosage of Performance Feedback Following COMPASS Consultation on Teacher and Student Outcomes
Language: English
Authors: Lindsey N. Ogle (ORCID 0000-0002-9261-4055), Lisa A. Ruble (ORCID 0000-0001-7495-6572), Michael D. Toland, John H. McGrew (ORCID 0000-0003-2874-3896)
Source: Remedial and Special Education. 2024 45(1):30-43.
Availability: SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2024
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) (DHHS/NIH)
Contract Number: R34MH111783
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Performance, Outcomes of Education, Educational Objectives, Student Educational Objectives, Success, Coaching (Performance), Autism Spectrum Disorders, Special Education Teachers, Special Education, Special Needs Students
DOI: 10.1177/07419325231164755
ISSN: 0741-9325
1538-4756
Abstract: Little is known about differences in dosage or feedback that make teacher coaching effective in relation to teacher and student outcomes. This study builds upon previous research on the Collaborative Model for Promoting Competence and Success (COMPASS) to understand the impact of different types (face-to-face coaching vs. emailed feedback) and dosages (one vs. two or four) of performance feedback compared to receiving no feedback following an initial consultation during which intervention plans were developed. Findings suggest that teacher adherence and student goal-attainment outcomes depend on dosage, not type of coaching. Specifically, having two or four opportunities for performance feedback was significantly better than having none or only one opportunity. Ratings of teacher adherence and student goal attainment delivered via emailed feedback or face-to-face coaching were similar, which may have important implications for cost and efficiency. While preliminary, the results are promising and warrant further research. Implications are also discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1407596
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Little is known about differences in dosage or feedback that make teacher coaching effective in relation to teacher and student outcomes. This study builds upon previous research on the Collaborative Model for Promoting Competence and Success (COMPASS) to understand the impact of different types (face-to-face coaching vs. emailed feedback) and dosages (one vs. two or four) of performance feedback compared to receiving no feedback following an initial consultation during which intervention plans were developed. Findings suggest that teacher adherence and student goal-attainment outcomes depend on dosage, not type of coaching. Specifically, having two or four opportunities for performance feedback was significantly better than having none or only one opportunity. Ratings of teacher adherence and student goal attainment delivered via emailed feedback or face-to-face coaching were similar, which may have important implications for cost and efficiency. While preliminary, the results are promising and warrant further research. Implications are also discussed.
ISSN:0741-9325
1538-4756
DOI:10.1177/07419325231164755