A Longitudinal Intervention Study of the Effects of Increasing Amount of Meaningful Writing across Grades 1 and 2

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Longitudinal Intervention Study of the Effects of Increasing Amount of Meaningful Writing across Grades 1 and 2
Language: English
Authors: Gustaf B. Skar (ORCID 0000-0002-6486-396X), Steve Graham, Alan Huebner, Anne Holten Kvistad, Marita Byberg Johansen, Arne Johannes Aasen
Source: Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2024 37(6):1345-1373.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 29
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Early Childhood Education
Elementary Education
Grade 1
Primary Education
Grade 2
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Intervention, Grade 1, Grade 2, Program Effectiveness, Foreign Countries, Writing Improvement, Handwriting, Student Attitudes, Elementary School Students
Geographic Terms: Norway
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-023-10460-0
ISSN: 0922-4777
1573-0905
Abstract: The current study examined the effectiveness of a "writing is caught" approach with young developing writers in Norway. This method is based on the premise that writing competence is acquired naturally through real use in meaningful contexts. Our longitudinal randomized control trial study tested this proposition by examining if increasing first grade students' opportunities to write in various genres for different purposes and for a range of audiences over a two-year time period improved the quality of their writing, handwriting fluency, and attitude towards writing. The study included data from 942 students (50.1% girls) in 26 schools randomly assigned to the experimental treatment, and 743 students (50.6% girls) in 25 schools randomly assigned to the business-as-usual (BAU) control condition. Across Grades 1 and 2, experimental teachers were asked to supplement their typical writing instruction by implementing 40 writing activities designed to increase students' purposeful writing. Increasing experimental students' writing over the two-year period did not result in statistically detectable differences in the writing quality, handwriting fluency, and attitude towards writing of students in the experimental and BAU control conditions. These findings did not provide support for the effectiveness of the "writing is caught" approach. Implications for theory, research, and practiced are discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1425928
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:The current study examined the effectiveness of a "writing is caught" approach with young developing writers in Norway. This method is based on the premise that writing competence is acquired naturally through real use in meaningful contexts. Our longitudinal randomized control trial study tested this proposition by examining if increasing first grade students' opportunities to write in various genres for different purposes and for a range of audiences over a two-year time period improved the quality of their writing, handwriting fluency, and attitude towards writing. The study included data from 942 students (50.1% girls) in 26 schools randomly assigned to the experimental treatment, and 743 students (50.6% girls) in 25 schools randomly assigned to the business-as-usual (BAU) control condition. Across Grades 1 and 2, experimental teachers were asked to supplement their typical writing instruction by implementing 40 writing activities designed to increase students' purposeful writing. Increasing experimental students' writing over the two-year period did not result in statistically detectable differences in the writing quality, handwriting fluency, and attitude towards writing of students in the experimental and BAU control conditions. These findings did not provide support for the effectiveness of the "writing is caught" approach. Implications for theory, research, and practiced are discussed.
ISSN:0922-4777
1573-0905
DOI:10.1007/s11145-023-10460-0