Sign Language Delays in Deaf 3- to 5-Year-Olds with Deaf Parents

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Sign Language Delays in Deaf 3- to 5-Year-Olds with Deaf Parents
Language: English
Authors: Donna A. Morere, Thomas E. Allen (ORCID 0000-0002-1545-8853), Maura Jaeger, Dana Winthrop
Source: Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2024 29(2):115-133.
Availability: Oxford University Press. Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, UK. Tel: +44-1865-353907; Fax: +44-1865-353485; e-mail: jnls.cust.serv@oxfordjournals.org; Web site: http://jdsde.oxfordjournals.org/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 19
Publication Date: 2024
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation (NSF), Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE)
National Science Foundation (NSF), Office of International Science & Engineering (OISE)
Contract Number: 1041725
1545900
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Sign Language, Young Children, Parents with Disabilities, Deafness, Developmental Delays, Visual Aids, Nonverbal Communication, Alternative Assessment, Skill Development, Language Skills
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enad059
ISSN: 1081-4159
1465-7325
Abstract: Research has demonstrated that deaf children of deaf signing parents (DOD) are afforded developmental advantages. This can be misconstrued as indicating that no DOD children exhibit early language delays (ELDs) because of their early access to a visual language. Little research has studied this presumption. In this study, we examine 174 ratings of DOD 3- to 5-year-old children, for whom signing in the home was indicated, using archival data from the online database of the Visual Communication and Sign Language Checklist. Our goals were to (1) examine the incidence of ELDs in a cohort of DOD children; (2) compare alternative scaling strategies for identifying ELD children; (3) explore patterns among behavioral ratings with a view toward developing a greater understanding of the types of language behaviors that may lie at the root of language delays; and (4) suggest recommendations for parents and professionals working with language-delayed DOD children. The results indicated that a significant number of ratings suggested ELDs, with a subset significantly delayed. These children likely require further evaluation. Among the less delayed group, ASL skills, rather than communication or cognition, were seen as the major concern, suggesting that even DOD children may require support developing linguistically accurate ASL. Overall, these findings support the need for early and ongoing evaluation of visual language skills in young DOD children.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1434417
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Research has demonstrated that deaf children of deaf signing parents (DOD) are afforded developmental advantages. This can be misconstrued as indicating that no DOD children exhibit early language delays (ELDs) because of their early access to a visual language. Little research has studied this presumption. In this study, we examine 174 ratings of DOD 3- to 5-year-old children, for whom signing in the home was indicated, using archival data from the online database of the Visual Communication and Sign Language Checklist. Our goals were to (1) examine the incidence of ELDs in a cohort of DOD children; (2) compare alternative scaling strategies for identifying ELD children; (3) explore patterns among behavioral ratings with a view toward developing a greater understanding of the types of language behaviors that may lie at the root of language delays; and (4) suggest recommendations for parents and professionals working with language-delayed DOD children. The results indicated that a significant number of ratings suggested ELDs, with a subset significantly delayed. These children likely require further evaluation. Among the less delayed group, ASL skills, rather than communication or cognition, were seen as the major concern, suggesting that even DOD children may require support developing linguistically accurate ASL. Overall, these findings support the need for early and ongoing evaluation of visual language skills in young DOD children.
ISSN:1081-4159
1465-7325
DOI:10.1093/deafed/enad059