A Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Professional Development for Increasing the Art and Science Content Knowledge of Novice and Experienced Elementary Science Teachers

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Professional Development for Increasing the Art and Science Content Knowledge of Novice and Experienced Elementary Science Teachers
Language: English
Authors: Sage Andersen, Bradley S. Hughes
Source: Journal of Educators Online. 2024 21(4).
Availability: Journal of Educators Online. Grand Canyon University, 23300 West Camelback Road, Phoenix, AZ 85017. e-mail: CIRT@gcu.edu. Web site: https://www.thejeo.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 16
Publication Date: 2024
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings (DRL)
Contract Number: 1321343
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, In Person Learning, Faculty Development, Art Education, Science Education, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Beginning Teachers, Experienced Teachers, Elementary School Teachers, Science Teachers, Knowledge Level, Interdisciplinary Approach, Earth Science, Differences, Age Differences, Teacher Improvement, Achievement Gains, Instructional Effectiveness
Geographic Terms: California
ISSN: 1547-500X
Abstract: This study compared two versions of the same elementary science professional development (PD) and curriculum program that were offered face-to-face and completely online, while keeping all content consistent between the two. Using quantitative analyses of pre- and posttests of content knowledge (CK), we evaluated the extent to which the online version of the PD compared to the face-to-face PD for increasing the earth science and art CK of upper elementary teachers required to teach an earth science and art integrated curriculum. Additionally, we explored how the impact of PD modality (online vs. face-to-face) on teachers' CK learning outcomes differed for novice and experienced teachers. Findings revealed significantly higher CK learning gains for teachers who participated in online PD compared with face-to-face PD, but with a small effect size. Subgroup analysis revealed that compared with experienced teachers, the novice teachers had significantly higher CK gains from participating in the online PD compared to the face-to-face version with a large effect size. We also discuss the implications for the design of large-scale online teacher PD.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1445535
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:This study compared two versions of the same elementary science professional development (PD) and curriculum program that were offered face-to-face and completely online, while keeping all content consistent between the two. Using quantitative analyses of pre- and posttests of content knowledge (CK), we evaluated the extent to which the online version of the PD compared to the face-to-face PD for increasing the earth science and art CK of upper elementary teachers required to teach an earth science and art integrated curriculum. Additionally, we explored how the impact of PD modality (online vs. face-to-face) on teachers' CK learning outcomes differed for novice and experienced teachers. Findings revealed significantly higher CK learning gains for teachers who participated in online PD compared with face-to-face PD, but with a small effect size. Subgroup analysis revealed that compared with experienced teachers, the novice teachers had significantly higher CK gains from participating in the online PD compared to the face-to-face version with a large effect size. We also discuss the implications for the design of large-scale online teacher PD.
ISSN:1547-500X