Caring Too Much? Emotional Labor and Compassion Fatigue among Faculty during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Caring Too Much? Emotional Labor and Compassion Fatigue among Faculty during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Language: English
Authors: Katie Constantin (ORCID 0000-0002-5220-3323), Gemini Creason-Parker, Cynthia Werner (ORCID 0000-0002-2662-8088), Elizabeth D. Jenkins (ORCID 0000-0002-1777-0656), Vansa Shewakramani Hanson (ORCID 0000-0001-6054-7196), Rose L. Siuta (ORCID 0000-0002-0910-9892)
Source: Research in Higher Education. 2024 65(7):1540-1560.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 21
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Emotional Response, Psychological Patterns, Altruism, Fatigue (Biology), College Faculty, COVID-19, Pandemics, Caring, Stress Variables, Trauma, Teaching Experience, Teacher Burnout
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-024-09799-2
ISSN: 0361-0365
1573-188X
Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic brought abrupt changes to teaching that caused increased stress amid an already difficult time. Whether teaching remote, hybrid, or in-person, university faculty were expected to continue teaching throughout the pandemic, despite personal challenges at home. In addition, there were expectations that faculty show greater levels of compassion towards their students. Multiple articles brought attention to these struggles and questioned whether university faculty might be experiencing compassion fatigue--a state of emotional exhaustion brought on by secondary traumatic stress and characterized by a reduced capacity for empathy. Using data from a larger, longitudinal qualitative study of faculty members' experiences during the pandemic, the present study aims to understand faculty experiences of emotional labor and compassion fatigue during this time. Unsurprisingly, most participants reported an increase in emotional labor during the early pandemic; however, roughly one in four described their emotional labor loads as unchanged or even decreased. In those cases, participants often described active disengagement practices in the workplace, or methods of "guarding one's time." Overall, compassion fatigue was less evident than anticipated, but there were identifiable signs of burnout among participants. This finding alone suggests a need for additional research to better conceptualize and operationalize the two terms.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1446294
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic brought abrupt changes to teaching that caused increased stress amid an already difficult time. Whether teaching remote, hybrid, or in-person, university faculty were expected to continue teaching throughout the pandemic, despite personal challenges at home. In addition, there were expectations that faculty show greater levels of compassion towards their students. Multiple articles brought attention to these struggles and questioned whether university faculty might be experiencing compassion fatigue--a state of emotional exhaustion brought on by secondary traumatic stress and characterized by a reduced capacity for empathy. Using data from a larger, longitudinal qualitative study of faculty members' experiences during the pandemic, the present study aims to understand faculty experiences of emotional labor and compassion fatigue during this time. Unsurprisingly, most participants reported an increase in emotional labor during the early pandemic; however, roughly one in four described their emotional labor loads as unchanged or even decreased. In those cases, participants often described active disengagement practices in the workplace, or methods of "guarding one's time." Overall, compassion fatigue was less evident than anticipated, but there were identifiable signs of burnout among participants. This finding alone suggests a need for additional research to better conceptualize and operationalize the two terms.
ISSN:0361-0365
1573-188X
DOI:10.1007/s11162-024-09799-2