Assessing Bibliographic Inaccuracy as a Contributing Factor for Unintended Loss in Shared Print Monograph Programs

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Assessing Bibliographic Inaccuracy as a Contributing Factor for Unintended Loss in Shared Print Monograph Programs
Language: English
Authors: Helen N. Levenson, Sara Amato, Ian Bogus, Fern E. Brody, Mary Miller, Jacob Nadal
Source: College & Research Libraries. 2024 85(7):1021-1034.
Availability: Association of College and Research Libraries. 50 East Huron Street, Chicago, IL 60611. e-mail: acrl@ala.org; Web site: http://crl.acrl.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Descriptors: Libraries, Library Automation, Library Materials, Library Services, Books, Shared Resources and Services, Bibliographic Databases, Online Catalogs, Accuracy, Library Networks
DOI: 10.5860/crl.85.7.1021
ISSN: 0010-0870
2150-6701
Abstract: Shared print programs are helping their member libraries right-size their collections. As they do, there are concerns about the adverse impact of bibliographic inaccuracies. This paper studies bibliographic record inaccuracies and the resulting frequency of mismatches between an item owned and the record representing ownership. Through analysis of interlibrary loan (ILL) survey data, the authors found an overall low rate of bibliographic inaccuracy, and that inaccuracies rarely prevented library staff from verifying the ownership of the item. The authors review how this finding contributes to confidence in library holding records, which is necessary for evaluating the optimal number of copies in shared print networks and for minimizing the risk in withdrawal decisions.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1449414
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Shared print programs are helping their member libraries right-size their collections. As they do, there are concerns about the adverse impact of bibliographic inaccuracies. This paper studies bibliographic record inaccuracies and the resulting frequency of mismatches between an item owned and the record representing ownership. Through analysis of interlibrary loan (ILL) survey data, the authors found an overall low rate of bibliographic inaccuracy, and that inaccuracies rarely prevented library staff from verifying the ownership of the item. The authors review how this finding contributes to confidence in library holding records, which is necessary for evaluating the optimal number of copies in shared print networks and for minimizing the risk in withdrawal decisions.
ISSN:0010-0870
2150-6701
DOI:10.5860/crl.85.7.1021